What Can Educational Psychology Learn From, and Contribute to, Theory Development Scholarship?

Author:

Greene Jeffrey A.

Abstract

AbstractOne of the field of psychology’s stated goals is to produce scholarship with findings that benefit the world. Over the last 10 years, psychology scholarship and its presumed societal benefits have been called into question due to the field’s history of questionable research practices, racism, and epistemic oppression. Calls for methodological, ethical, and practical reforms are essential to building a psychological science that is just, effective, reliable, and beneficial. Recently, these calls have been complemented by a push to reform how theory is developed and used in psychology. There is great need for better understanding and implementation of theory development, both in the field of psychology broadly as well as in its subdisciplines, including educational psychology. At the same time, educational psychologists have much to contribute to the tripartite calls for methodological, ethical, and theory reforms. In this paper, I explore theory development in psychology by discussing the importance of developing both the descriptive and explanatory aspects of theory as well as the need to refine how theory is evaluated and integrated. Then, I review how innovations and practices in educational psychology can inform the broader theory reform movement in psychology writ large. Finally, I identify important future directions for further advancing theory reform in psychology, including addressing ableism in the field, increasing the field’s hospitability for theory revision, furthering theory development transparency, and more deeply integrating theory development into preparation programs.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Developmental and Educational Psychology

Reference117 articles.

1. American Psychological Association. (2022). Impact APA. Retrieved from: https://www.apa.org/about/apa/strategic-plan. Accessed 24 Jan 2022.

2. American Psychological Association. (2021). Apology to people of color for APA’s role in promoting, perpetuating, and failing to challenge racism, racial discrimination, and human hierarchy in US: [Resolution adopted by the APA Council of Representatives]. Apology to people of color for APA’s role in promoting, perpetuating, and failing to challenge racism, racial discrimination, and human hierarchy in US https://www.apa.org/about/policy/racism-apology. Accessed 24 Jan 2022.

3. Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the commission on reading. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education, National Institute of Education, & Center for the Study of Reading.

4. Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., & Greene, J. A. (2012). Projecting educational psychology’s future from its past and present: A trend analysis. In APA educational psychology handbook, Vol 1: Theories, constructs, and critical issues. (pp. 3–32). American Psychological Association.

5. Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., & Reynolds, R. E. (2009). What is learning anyway? A Topographical Perspective Considered. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903029006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3