Abstract
AbstractOne of the field of psychology’s stated goals is to produce scholarship with findings that benefit the world. Over the last 10 years, psychology scholarship and its presumed societal benefits have been called into question due to the field’s history of questionable research practices, racism, and epistemic oppression. Calls for methodological, ethical, and practical reforms are essential to building a psychological science that is just, effective, reliable, and beneficial. Recently, these calls have been complemented by a push to reform how theory is developed and used in psychology. There is great need for better understanding and implementation of theory development, both in the field of psychology broadly as well as in its subdisciplines, including educational psychology. At the same time, educational psychologists have much to contribute to the tripartite calls for methodological, ethical, and theory reforms. In this paper, I explore theory development in psychology by discussing the importance of developing both the descriptive and explanatory aspects of theory as well as the need to refine how theory is evaluated and integrated. Then, I review how innovations and practices in educational psychology can inform the broader theory reform movement in psychology writ large. Finally, I identify important future directions for further advancing theory reform in psychology, including addressing ableism in the field, increasing the field’s hospitability for theory revision, furthering theory development transparency, and more deeply integrating theory development into preparation programs.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology
Reference117 articles.
1. American Psychological Association. (2022). Impact APA. Retrieved from: https://www.apa.org/about/apa/strategic-plan. Accessed 24 Jan 2022.
2. American Psychological Association. (2021). Apology to people of color for APA’s role in promoting, perpetuating, and failing to challenge racism, racial discrimination, and human hierarchy in US: [Resolution adopted by the APA Council of Representatives]. Apology to people of color for APA’s role in promoting, perpetuating, and failing to challenge racism, racial discrimination, and human hierarchy in US https://www.apa.org/about/policy/racism-apology. Accessed 24 Jan 2022.
3. Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the commission on reading. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education, National Institute of Education, & Center for the Study of Reading.
4. Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., & Greene, J. A. (2012). Projecting educational psychology’s future from its past and present: A trend analysis. In APA educational psychology handbook, Vol 1: Theories, constructs, and critical issues. (pp. 3–32). American Psychological Association.
5. Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., & Reynolds, R. E. (2009). What is learning anyway? A Topographical Perspective Considered. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903029006
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献