Learning Mechanisms Explaining Learning With Digital Tools in Educational Settings: a Cognitive Process Framework
-
Published:2024-01-26
Issue:1
Volume:36
Page:
-
ISSN:1040-726X
-
Container-title:Educational Psychology Review
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Educ Psychol Rev
Author:
Reinhold FrankORCID, Leuders TimoORCID, Loibl KatharinaORCID, Nückles Matthias, Beege MaikORCID, Boelmann Jan M.
Abstract
AbstractTo explain successful subject matter learning with digital tools, the specification of mediating cognitive processes is crucial for any empirical investigation. We introduce a cognitive process framework for the mechanisms of learning with digital tools (CoDiL) that combines core ideas from the psychology of instruction (utilization-of-learning-opportunity framework), cognitive psychology (knowledge-learning-instruction framework), and domain-specific research on learning and instruction. This synthesizing framework can be used to theoretically ground, firstly, the design of digital tools for learning, and secondly, the empirical analysis of students’ learning activities in digitally enriched educational settings via the analysis of specific student-tool interactions.
Funder
Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg Pädagogische Hochschule Freiburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education
Reference109 articles.
1. Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F., & Wallace, R. (2003). Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research, 73(3), 277–320. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543073003277 2. Aleven, V., McLaughlin, E. A., Glenn, R. A., & Koedinger, K. R. (2017). Instruction based on adaptive learning technologies. In R. E. Mayer & P. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (2nd ed., pp. 522–560). Routledge. 3. Alp Christ, A., Capon-Sieber, V., Grob, U., & Praetorius, A.-K. (2022). Learning processes and their mediating role between teaching quality and student achievement: A systematic review. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 75, 101209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101209 4. Anderson, J. R., Matessa, M., & Lebiere, C. (1997). ACT-R: A theory of higher level cognition and its relation to visual attention. Human-Computer Interaction, 12(4), 439–462. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1204_5 5. Arnon, I., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Oktaç, A., Roa Fuentes, S., Trigueros, M., & Weller, K. (2014). APOS theory: A framework for research and curriculum development in mathematics education. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7966-6
|
|