Abstract
AbstractIn recent decades, researchers’ interest in the role of emotions in individual political learning has grown. However, it is still unclear whether and how discrete emotions are associated with political learning. Through a cross-disciplinary systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis, we reviewed which discrete emotions have been analyzed in the context of political learning so far and meta-analytically synthesized how these emotions relate to political learning. We addressed this question by synthesizing associations between discrete emotions and various aspects of learning about political matters, such as political attention, information seeking, discussions, knowledge, and knowledge gain. The final dataset included 66 publications with 486 effect sizes, involving more than 100,000 participants. Most of the effect sizes were based on negative-activating emotions (65%; mainly anxiety, 32%, and anger, 19%) and positive-activating emotions (32%; mainly enthusiasm, 15%), while studies on positive-deactivating emotions (e.g., contentment) and negative-deactivating emotions (e.g., sadness) are largely lacking. We uncovered small positive associations (r = .05 to .13) for activating emotions, of both negative (especially anger) and positive valence (e.g., enthusiasm, only in cross-sectional designs), but no associations for negative-deactivating emotions. We discuss theoretical implications and recommend future research to include previously unconsidered emotions in order to extend existing findings.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference149 articles.
1. *Albertson, B., & Gadarian, S. K. (2010). Anxiety in a public health crisis: The effects of anxiety on trust and learning [Paper presentation]. Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology (ISPP), Istanbul, Turkey.
2. *Albertson, B., & Gadarian, S. K. (2015). Anxious politics: Democratic citizenship in a threatening world. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139963107
3. Aloe, A. M. (2014). An empirical investigation of partial effect sizes in meta-analysis of correlational data. The Journal of General Psychology, 141(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2013.853021
4. American Psychological Association. (2019). Publication manual of the American psychological association. American Psychological Association.
5. Assink, M., & Wibbelink, C. J. (2016). Fitting three-level meta-analytic models in r: A step-by-step tutorial. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 12(3), 154–174. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.12.3.p154