From Revolutionary to Stakeholder: Looking at Identity Discourses to Understand the 2016 Short-term Change in China’s North Korea Policy

Author:

Olczak NicholasORCID

Abstract

AbstractDuring 2016 China’s policies towards North Korea appeared to undergo considerable short-term change, increasingly distancing itself from its neighbour and instead supporting the international community’s response. Existing research has focused on long-term policy change and given little importance to short-term changes in policy, or has drawn on realist and constructivist theories which expect consistency and struggle to account for these changes. This article took an identity discourse approach to understanding the 2016 short-term changes in China’s North Korea policy. It used quantitative computer assisted text analysis methods to measure changes in the dominance of different identity discourses related to North Korea that are produced on the Chinese Internet. It found that around 2015–2016, a previously more dominant “revolutionary” identity discourse lost dominance to a “stakeholder” identity discourse. The article argues that this change made possible the shift in approach to North Korea at the start of 2016 and indicates ways the short-term policy changes at this time may contribute to longer-term change in China’s behaviour.

Funder

Marianne och Marcus Wallenberg

Stockholm University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science

Reference55 articles.

1. Lou, T. 2016. Is China Finally Fed Up With Kim Jong-un’s North Korea? The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2016/03/is-china-finally-fed-up-with-kim-jong-uns-north-korea/ Accessed 28 Jan 2023.

2. Phillips, T., and J. McCurry. 2017. US and China agree to “maximise pressure” on North Korea. Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/19/us-and-china-agree-to-maximise-pressure-on-north-korea Accessed 28 Jan 2023.

3. Jiang, Y. 2019. Sanctions are an important tool in China’s North Korea diplomacy. DIIS Policy Brief.

4. Mason, J. 2017. China’s imports from North Korea sink as coal ban bites. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-economy-trade-northkorea-idUSKBN18J0C6 Accessed 28 Jan 2023.

5. Lee, D. S., I. Alexandrova, and Y. Zhao. 2020. The chinese failure to disarm North Korea: geographical proximity, U.S. unipolarity, and alliance restraint. Contemporary Security Policy 41 (4): 587–609.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3