Abstract
AbstractLightweight design is often assumed to be the leading strategy to improve the sustainability of parts produced by additive manufacturing. The present study confutes such an assumption by a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of different lightweight strategies applied to a specific case study in the medical field. In particular, a patient-specific finger splint made of polyamide is redesigned by means of generative design, topology optimization and lattice structures. The analysis investigates two markedly different deposition processes, namely Arburg plastic freeforming and fused filament fabrication. The former is carried out on an industrial-grade machine, while a desktop printer is used for the latter. This allows for observing the impact of the redesign in two quite distinct scenarios. Findings demonstrate that, since environmental impacts are mainly driven by building time, the adoption of automated design algorithms can be detrimental to the sustainability of the process. On the other hand, relevant benefits on environmental impacts were achieved by reducing the infill percentage of parts. The results of this work highlight the most relevant aspects which must be considered to limit environmental impacts when designing parts for deposition-based additive manufacturing. This information can be used by designers to drive weight reduction towards sustainability.
Funder
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Universitá e della Ricerca
Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,General Engineering,Aerospace Engineering,Automotive Engineering,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Applied Mathematics
Reference49 articles.
1. Dilberoglu UM, Gharehpapagh B, Yaman U, Dolen M (2017) The role of additive manufacturing in the era of industry 4.0. Proced Manuf 11:545–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.148
2. Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, Nguyen KTQ, Hui D (2018) Additive manufacturing (3D printing): a review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos Part B Eng 143:172–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012
3. Grand View Research: 3D Printing Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Component, By Printer Type (Desktop, Industrial), By Technology, By Software, By Application, By Vertical, By Material, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2021 - 2028. Technical report (2021). https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/3d-printing-industry-analysis/methodology
4. 3D Hubs: 3D printing trends 2020 Industry highlights and market trend. Technical report (2020)
5. Garcia FL, Moris VAdS, Nunes AO, Silva DAL (2018) Environmental performance of additive manufacturing process - an overview. Rapid Prototyp J 24(7):1166–1177. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-05-2017-0108