The Viability of Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs) in the UK: The Impact on Global Anti-Bribery Compliance

Author:

Bu Qingxiu

Abstract

AbstractDeferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) provide an alternative enforcement tool to tackle economic crime. Prosecutors tailor punishment and remediation measures more accurately to satisfy the principles of prosecution. The companies in question can avoid criminal charges, provided that they comply with agreed terms and conditions. The use of DPAs is conducive to relieving collateral consequences, while being able to deter, punish and reshape corporate behaviour. In principle, enforcement authorities can maximise the leverage with criminal liability over companies to cultivate a robust corporate culture against bribery. It is argued that an effective global anti-bribery regime rests with not only transnational cooperation, but also adequate governance and rigorous compliance. With the DPAs having increased in prominence as a mainstay of the US enforcement regime, it remains to be seen whether the potent tool will be viable and further reshape the future enforcement landscape of the anti-bribery regime in the UK and even on a global basis.

Funder

University of Sussex

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Political Science and International Relations,Business and International Management

Reference123 articles.

1. Addady M (2016, October 7) Walmart rejects paying $600 million settlement in bribery investigation. Fortune

2. Adler A (2014) Dual sovereignty, due process, and duplicative punishment: a new solution to an old problem. Yale Law J 124:448–483

3. Alderman R (2014) B20 Task Force on Improving Transparency and Anticorruption: development of a preliminary study on possible regulatory developments to enhance the private sector role in the fight against corruption in a global business context. 8 January 2014. https://www.aodv231.it/images/image/Allegato%201%20-Preliminary_Study_v_2%201.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2021

4. Alexander C, Cohen M (2015) The evolution of corporate criminal settlements: an empirical perspective on non-prosecution, deferred prosecution, and plea agreements. Am Crim Law Rev 52:537–594

5. Allen B (2014) Deferred prosecution agreements—a new weapon in the anti-fraud and corruption armoury? Gov Dir 66:285–287

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3