Abstract
AbstractThis study empirically investigates China’s participation in the globalized cross-border insolvency collaboration system. It is the first time for the development of China’s cross-border insolvency law to be examined against the background of private international law on foreign judgment recognition and enforcement. The findings of this article reveal that foreign bankruptcy representatives face considerable difficulties in satisfying the treaty and reciprocity requirements when seeking judicial assistance from China, and that local protectionism in favour of China’s state-owned and state-linked companies undermines foreign bankruptcy representatives’ confidence in approaching China’s courts for support. Although there are several court recognitions of foreign bankruptcy judgments in China, this article finds that they are only used to acknowledge the legal status of foreign bankruptcy representatives to meet the demands of government authorities; Chinese courts have not taken a substantial step in recognizing a foreign bankruptcy judgment so as to bar individual creditors’ action in the interest of a foreign bankruptcy proceeding. On the contrary, for Chinese bankruptcy representatives seeking assistance abroad, they could take advantage of the liberal judicial infrastructure, especially of some advanced jurisdictions, to obtain recognition and relief.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations,Business and International Management
Reference93 articles.
1. Agence France Presse (1991) Chinese banks lost money with BCCI: report. Agence France Presse, Hong Kong, 2 August 1991
2. Ahl B (2019) Judicialization in authoritarian regimes: the expansion of powers of the Chinese Supreme People’s Court. Int J Const Law 17:252–277
3. Arsenault SJ (2011) Leaping over the Great Wall: examining cross-border insolvency in China under the Chinese corporate bankruptcy law. Ind Int & Comp Law Rev 21:1–24
4. Barboza D (2009) Danone exits China venture after years of legal dispute. New York Times, 30 September 2009
5. Blackwell H (2017) Recent developments in the PRC: a change in tide for arbitration? Kluwer Arbitration Blog. http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2017/12/05/recent-developments-prc-change-tide-arbitration/. Accessed 4 May 2020
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献