Abstract
AbstractThe paper introduces a modified version of a genetic algorithm with aggressive mutation (GAAM) called fGAAM (fast GAAM) that significantly decreases the time needed to find feature subsets of a satisfactory classification accuracy. To demonstrate the time gains provided by fGAAM both algorithms were tested on eight datasets containing different number of features, classes, and examples. The fGAAM was also compared with four reference methods: the Holland GA with and without penalty term, Culling GA, and NSGA II. Results: (i) The fGAAM processing time was about 35% shorter than that of the original GAAM. (ii) The fGAAM was also 20 times quicker than two Holland GAs and 50 times quicker than NSGA II. (iii) For datasets of different number of features, classes, and examples, another number of individuals, stored for further processing, provided the highest acceleration. On average, the best results were obtained when individuals from the last 10 populations were stored (time acceleration: 36.39%) or when the number of individuals to be stored was calculated by the algorithm itself (time acceleration: 35.74%). (iv) The fGAAM was able to process all datasets used in the study, even those that, because of their high number of features, could not be processed by the two Holland GAs and NSGA II.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Reference39 articles.
1. Deon G, Peterson David A, Anderson Charles W, Thaut Michael H (2003) Comparison of linear, nonlinear, and feature selection methods for EEG signal classification. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 11(2):141–144
2. Marcin K, Andrzej M, and Remigiusz JR (2011) A new method of EEG classification for BCI with feature extraction based on higher order statistics of wavelet components and selection with genetic algorithms. In Proceedings of International Conference on Adaptive and Natural Computing Algorithms, pages 280–289
3. Peterson DA, Knight JN, Kirby MJ, Anderson CW, Thaut MH (2005) Feature selection and blind source separation in an EEG-based brain-computer interface. EURASIP J Appl Signal Process 19:3128–3140
4. Vafaie H, Imam IF, et al (1994) Feature selection methods: genetic algorithms vs. greedy-like search. In Proceedings of the international conference on fuzzy and intelligent control systems, 51: 28
5. Zhao M, Fu C, Ji L, Tang K, Zhou M (2011) Feature selection and parameter optimization for support vector machines: A new approach based on genetic algorithm with feature chromosomes. Expert Syst Appl 38(5):5197–5204
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献