Abstract
AbstractWe study a hybrid marketplace such as Amazon that sells its own products and sets commissions on third-party sellers that engage in monopolistic competition with free entry. For a large class of microfoundations based on a representative agent, the introduction of its own products by the marketplace is neutral for consumer welfare for a given commission; but this product introduction exerts an ambiguous impact through changes of the commission. A “demand substitution mechanism” pushes for a higher commission; but an “extensive margin mechanism” pushes for a lower commission that is aimed at attracting new sellers and more purchases on the marketplace. For instance, with constant demand elasticities, a hybrid marketplace sets a lower (higher) commission rate and increases (decreases) consumer welfare compared to a pure marketplace if its products face a less (more) elastic demand.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Economics and Econometrics
Reference50 articles.
1. Alfaro, M. (2020). On strategic investments by leader firms under endogenous entry and quantity competition. Economics Bulletin, 40(4), 3231–3240.
2. Alfaro, M., & Lander, D. (2021). Restricting entry without aggressive pricing. Research in Economics, 75(4), 305–319.
3. Anderson, S., & Bedre-Defolie, Ö . (2021). Hybrid platform model. CEPR DP 16243.
4. Anderson, S., & Bedre-Defolie, Ö. (2022). Online trade platforms: Hosting, selling, or both? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 84, 102861.
5. Anderson, S., & de Palma, A. (2015). Economic distributions and primitive distributions in monopolistic competition. CEPR DP 10748.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献