Abstract
AbstractIn the literature on the Moral Limits of the Markets, Kant’s moral philosophy is often employed to assess the amoral or immoral nature of the commercial sphere. Markets and morality are antipodes since the instrumentality of market transactions excludes or undermines moral values. The kingdom of ends, where everything has either a price or a dignity, closes the door to market logic. The present paper challenges this view, which is also endorsed by business ethics authors advocating for Moral Purism. I will show that Kant imagined a market within the Kingdom of Ends where everyone pursues their own aims while assisting others in pursuing theirs. This model, built on the universalization of the maxim of mutual assistance and the duty of honoring the spirit of mutually beneficial contracts, can be employed to judge the morality of real (empirical) market transactions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Arnold, D.G., and J.D. Harris, eds. 2012. Kantian business ethics: critical perspectives. Edward Elgar Publishing.
2. Anderson, E., and 1993. 1995. Value in ethics and economics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
3. Baxley, A.N. 2010. Kant’s Theory of Virtue: The Value of Autocracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bénabou, R., A. Falk, and L. Henkel. 2022. Ends versus means: Kantians, utilitarians and Moral decisions. WP. Pre-registred at: https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/7714. Accessed 13/02/2024.
5. Bowie, N.E. 2002. A Kantian approach to business ethics. In Ethical issues in business: A philosophical approach, 7th ed. Edited by Joseph D. Van Zandt, Patricia Hogue Werhane, Thomas Donaldson. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.