Abstract
AbstractElizabeth Anderson claims that the prevailing culture of business is one of domination. “Most workplace governments in the United States are dictatorships, in which bosses. . don’t merely govern workers; they dominate them” (2017, p. xxii; italics in the original). If this diagnosis is correct, then the culture of business poses a significant threat to human liberty, as each year millions of people in the employ of businesses spend hundreds or thousands of hours on the job. This essay provides a further argument supporting Anderson’s analysis, by extending her treatment of Adam Smith and drawing on his claim about the potentially mind-numbing effects on workers of extreme division of labor. Smith’s analysis, though consistent with Anderson’s, implies that the problem is more worrisome than she allows, and accordingly that Anderson’s own remedy might be insufficient. Our Anderson/Smith argument suggests that worker unfreedom might warrant more aggressive institutional remedy.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference56 articles.
1. Anderson, E. 2017. Private government: How employers rule our lives (and why we don’t talk about it). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2. Anderson, E. 2018. Interview with Russ Roberts. Elizabeth Anderson on worker rights and private Government. Library of Economics and Liberty (EconTalk podcast interview). Retrieved January 11, 2022, from https://www.econtalk.org/elizabeth-anderson-on-worker-rights-and-private-government/.
3. Babiak, P., and R.D. Hare. 2006. Snakes in suits: Understanding and surviving the psychopaths in your office. New York: Harper Business.
4. Berlin, I. 2008. Two concepts of liberty. In Liberty, ed H Hardy, 166–217. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Blanc, S. 2014. Expanding workers’ moral space: A liberal critique of corporate capitalism. Journal of Business Ethics 120: 473–488.