Abstract
AbstractSymptoms of illness offer insights into an organism’s condition, altering social signals that affect others’ behavior. Nestling birds employ begging signals to solicit parental care, but the extent to which begging reflects nestling health beyond hunger remains controversial. We investigated how experimentally induced changes in health affect begging signals in spotless starling (Sturnus unicolor) nestlings. To alter health status, we challenged nestlings by injecting lipopolysaccharide (LPS) -an antigen that elicits an immune response- or a control substance (PBS) and observed begging behavior under controlled food deprivation conditions. LPS-treated nestlings exhibited delayed gaping, reduced stretching, and less begging time compared to control nestlings. Moreover, LPS-treated nestlings produced calls with higher spectral entropy, particularly when deprived of food for longer. Our findings indicate that begging signals are sensitive to induced sickness. However, addressing mechanistic issues is crucial for effectively testing whether begging reflects nestling condition as a signal of quality in future experimental setups.
Funder
Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference109 articles.
1. Adamo SA, Barlett A, Le J, Spencer N, Sullivan K (2010) Illness-induced anorexia may reduce trade-offs between digestion and immune function. Anim Behav 79:3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.10.012
2. Armour EM, Bruner TL, Hines JK, Butler MW (2020) Low-dose immune challenges result in detectable levels of oxidative damage. J Exp Biol 223:jeb220095. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.220095
3. Ashley NT, Wingfield JC (2012) Sickness behavior in vertebrates: allostasis, life-history modulation, and hormonal regulation. In: Demas GE, Nelson RJ (eds) Ecoimmunology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 45–91
4. Banbura J, Lambrechts MM, Blondel J, Perret P, Cartan-Son M (1999) Food handling time of blue tit chicks: constraints and adaptation to different prey types. J Avian Biol 30:263–270. https://doi.org/10.2307/3677352
5. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false Discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57:289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.2517-6161.1995.TB02031.X