Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Seeinfra note 44. Even if the defendant chooses to admit guilt, the presiding juidge will still conduct a limited trail. Joachim Hermann,Bargining Justice: A Bargain for German Criminal Justice, 53 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 755, 763 (1992).
2. “Americans tend to equare inquisitorial systems with coercive interrogation, unbridled search, and undualy efficient crime control.” Abraham Goldstein,Reflections on Two Models: Inquistitorial Themes in American Criminal Procedure, 26 Stan. L. Rev. 1009, 1018 (1974).
3. But see Albert Alschuler,Implementing the Criminal Defendant's Right to Trial: Alternatives to the Plea Bargining System, 50 U. Chi. L. Rev. 931 (1983) (arguing that for about $850 million more than was then being spent on the crimnal justice system, every defendant could be given a 3-day jury trial).
4. The National Center for State Courts found that in 13 jurisdictions surveryed, the percentage of felony cases resolved by jury trial ranged from a low of 2.1 in Texas to a high of 6.9 in Alaska. Jeffrey Abramson,We, The Jury 298 (1994).
5. For an interesting discussion of this problem,compare Robert Scott & Wiliam Stuntz,Plea Bargainging as contract, 101 Yale L.J. 1909, 1948–49 (1992),with Stephen Schulhofer,Plea Barganing as Diseaster, 101 Yale L.J. 1979, 1981–83 (1992).
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献