Abstract
AbstractThe existence of groups of nodes with common characteristics and the relationships between these groups are important factors influencing the structures of social, technological, biological, and other networks. Uncovering such groups and the relationships between them is, therefore, necessary for understanding these structures. Groups can either be found by detection algorithms based solely on structural analysis or identified on the basis of more in-depth knowledge of the processes taking place in networks. In the first case, these are mainly algorithms detecting non-overlapping communities or communities with small overlaps. The latter case is about identifying ground-truth communities, also on the basis of characteristics other than only network structure. Recent research into ground-truth communities shows that in real-world networks, there are nested communities or communities with large and dense overlaps which we are not yet able to detect satisfactorily only on the basis of structural network properties.In our approach, we present a new perspective on the problem of group detection using only the structural properties of networks. Its main contribution is pointing out the existence of large and dense overlaps of detected groups. We use the non-symmetric structural similarity between pairs of nodes, which we refer to as dependency, to detect groups that we call zones. Unlike other approaches, we are able, thanks to non-symmetry, accurately to describe the prominent nodes in the zones which are responsible for large zone overlaps and the reasons why overlaps occur. The individual zones that are detected provide new information associated in particular with the non-symmetric relationships within the group and the roles that individual nodes play in the zone. From the perspective of global network structure, because of the non-symmetric node-to-node relationships, we explore new properties of real-world networks that describe the differences between various types of networks.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computational Mathematics,Computer Networks and Communications,Multidisciplinary
Reference55 articles.
1. Abbasi, A, Chung KSK, Hossain L (2012) Egocentric analysis of co-authorship network structure, position and performance. Inf Process Manag 48(4):671–679.
2. Agrawal, M, Zitnik M, Leskovec J, et al (2018) Large-scale analysis of disease pathways in the human interactome. Pac Symp Biocomput 23:111–122. World Scientific.
3. Ahn, Y-Y, Bagrow JP, Lehmann S (2010) Link communities reveal multiscale complexity in networks. Nature 466(7307):761.
4. Aiello, LM, Deplano M, Schifanella R, Ruffo G (2012) People are strange when you’re a stranger: Impact and influence of bots on social networks In: ICWSM’12: Proceedings of the 6th AAAI International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.. AAAI.
5. Albert, R, Barabási A-L (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys 74(1):47.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献