Correcting a nonparametric two-sample graph hypothesis test for graphs with different numbers of vertices with applications to connectomics

Author:

Alyakin Anton A.,Agterberg Joshua,Helm Hayden S.,Priebe Carey E.

Abstract

AbstractRandom graphs are statistical models that have many applications, ranging from neuroscience to social network analysis. Of particular interest in some applications is the problem of testing two random graphs for equality of generating distributions. Tang et al. (Bernoulli 23:1599–1630, 2017) propose a test for this setting. This test consists of embedding the graph into a low-dimensional space via the adjacency spectral embedding (ASE) and subsequently using a kernel two-sample test based on the maximum mean discrepancy. However, if the two graphs being compared have an unequal number of vertices, the test of Tang et al. (Bernoulli 23:1599–1630, 2017) may not be valid. We demonstrate the intuition behind this invalidity and propose a correction that makes any subsequent kernel- or distance-based test valid. Our method relies on sampling based on the asymptotic distribution for the ASE. We call these altered embeddings the corrected adjacency spectral embeddings (CASE). We also show that CASE remedies the exchangeability problem of the original test and demonstrate the validity and consistency of the test that uses CASE via a simulation study. Lastly, we apply our proposed test to the problem of determining equivalence of generating distributions in human connectomes extracted from diffusion magnetic resonance imaging at different scales.

Funder

Defense Advanced Research Programs Agency

Microsoft Research

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Computational Mathematics,Computer Networks and Communications,Multidisciplinary

Reference65 articles.

1. Agterberg J, Tang M, Priebe CE (2020) On two distinct sources of nonidentifiability in latent position random graph models. arXiv:2003.14250

2. Airoldi EM, Blei DM, Fienberg SE, Xing EP (2008) Mixed membership stochastic blockmodels. J Mach Learn Res 9:1981–2014

3. Arroyo J, Athreya A, Cape J, Chen G, Priebe CE, Vogelstein JT (2021) Inference for multiple heterogeneous networks with a common invariant subspace

4. Asta DM, Shalizi CR (2015) Geometric network comparisons. In: Proceedings of the thirty-first conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence, UAI’15, Arlington, Virginia, United States, pp. 102–110. AUAI Press

5. Athreya A, Priebe CE, Tang M, Lyzinski V, Marchette DJ, Sussman DL (2016) A limit theorem for scaled eigenvectors of random dot product graphs. Sankhya A 78(1):1–18

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3