Author:
Rustamaji Heru C.,Suharini Yustina S.,Permana Angga A.,Kusuma Wisnu A.,Nurdiati Sri,Batubara Irmanida,Djatna Taufik
Abstract
AbstractCancer patients with comorbidities face various life problems, health costs, and quality of life. Therefore, determining comorbid diseases would significantly affect the treatment of cancer patients. Because cancer disease is very complex, we can represent the relationship between cancer and its comorbidities as a network. Furthermore, the network analysis can be employed to determine comorbidities as a community detection problem because the relationship between cancer and its comorbidities forms a community. This study investigates which community detection algorithms are more appropriate to determine the comorbid of cancer. Given different community findings, this study attempted to analyze the modularity generated by the algorithm to decide the significant comorbid diseases. We retrieved lung cancer comorbid data on the basis of text mining manuscripts in PubMed, searched through disease ontologies, and calculated disease similarity. We investigate 20 algorithms using five modularity metrics and 16 fitness function evaluations to determine the significant comorbid diseases. The results show the five best modularity algorithms, namely label propagation, spinglass, Chinese whispers, Louvain, RB Pots. These five algorithms found significant comorbidities: blood vessels, immune system, bone, pancreas, and metabolic disorders, atrial cardiac septal defect, atrial fibrillation respiratory system, interstitial lung, and diabetes mellitus. The fitness function justifies the results of the community algorithm, and the ones that have a significant effect are average internal degree, size, and edges inside. This study contributes to more comprehensive knowledge and management of diseases in the healthcare context.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computational Mathematics,Computer Networks and Communications,Multidisciplinary
Reference84 articles.
1. Ahmadi M, Sharifi A, Jafarian Fard M, Soleimani N (2021) Detection of brain lesion location in MRI images using convolutional neural network and robust PCA. Int J Neurosci 1–12. ISSN 15635279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207454.2021.1883602
2. Bandyopadhyay D, Ball S, Hajra A, Chakraborty S, Dey AK, Ghosh RK, Palazzo AM (2019) Impact of atrial fibrillation in patients with lung cancer: insights from National Inpatient Sample. IJC Heart Vasc 22:216–217. ISSN 23529067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.02.012
3. Bang UC, Benfield T, Hyldstrup L, Bendtsen F, Beck Jensen JE (2014) Mortality, cancer, and comorbidities associated with chronic pancreatitis: a Danish nationwide matched-cohort study. Gastroenterology 146(4):989–994.e1. ISSN 15280012. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2013.12.033
4. Barabasi A-L (2016) Network science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
5. Barabási AL, Gulbahce N, Loscalzo J (2011) Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease. ISSN 14710056. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b &scp=78650373804 &origin=inward
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献