Author:
Kejriwal Mayank,Dang Akarsh
Abstract
AbstractIn recent history, the Panama Papers have comprised one of the largest and most influential leaks detailing information on offshore entities, company officers and financial (and legal) intermediaries, and has led to a global exposé of corruption and tax evasion. A systematic analysis of this information can provide valuable insights into the structure and properties of these entities and the relations between them. Network science can be applied as a scientific framework for understanding the structure of such relational, heterogeneous datasets at scale. In this article, we use an existing, relational version of the Panama Papers to selectively construct various networks, and then study the properties of the underlying system using well-defined analytical methods from network science, including degree properties, country assortativity analyses, connectivity and single-point network metrics like transitivity and density. We also illustrate significant structural features in these networks by conducting a triad census and exploring the networks’ core-periphery structure. Together, these results are used to show that the Panama Papers constitute a distinct class of networks that differ significantly from ordinary social and information networks. We also propose, construct and analyze ‘higher-order’ networks from the raw data, such as a ‘social’ network of officers. We confirm that some of these higher-order networks also show significant non-random deviations from expected or typical behavior, including in their degree distributions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computational Mathematics,Computer Networks and Communications,Multidisciplinary
Reference41 articles.
1. Antal, T, Krapivsky PL, Redner S (2005) Dynamics of social balance on networks. Phys Rev E 72(3):036121.
2. Baldwin, R, Forslid R, Martin P, Ottaviano G, Robert-Nicoud F (2011) Economic geography and public policy. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
3. Barabási, A-L, et al. (2016) Network science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. Borgatti, SP, Mehra A, Brass DJ, Labianca G (2009) Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323(5916):892–895.
5. Chen, P, Redner S (2010) Community structure of the physical review citation network. J Informetrics 4(3):278–290.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献