Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference14 articles.
1. Bancalari, S. (2010). Eidos versus Intersoggetività: Una Prospettiva Husserliana sull’Impossibile. Archivio di Filosofia, 229–238.
2. De Santis, D. (2011). Phenomenological kaleidoscope: Remarks on the Husserlian method of eidetic variation. The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy, pp. 17–42.
3. ---. (2020). Variation. In D. De Santis, B. Hopkins, & C. Majolino (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of phenomenology and phenomenological philosophy (pp. 425–434). London: Routledge.
4. Djian, A. (2020). Hen epi pollôn. The origin of Husserl’s eidetic variation and the divide between Plato and Aristotle on the universals. In D. De Santis, C. Majolino (Eds.), Phenomenology and the History of Platonism. Special issue of Studia Phaenomenologica (forthcoming).
5. Held, K. (1966). Lebendige Gegenwart. Die Frage nach der Seinsweise des transzendentalen Ich bei Edmund Husserl, entwickelt am Leitfaden der Zeitproblem. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献