Abstract
AbstractThe goal of this paper is to provide an account of the role played by logic in the context of what Husserl names the “crisis of European sciences.” Presupposing the analyses offered in the Krisis, I look at Formale und Transzendentale Logik to demonstrate that the crisis of logic stems from the deviation of its original meaning as a “theory of science” and from its restriction to a mere “theoretical technique.” Through a comparison between Aristotelian syllogistic and modern logic, I show why the modern discovery of the purely formal dimension of knowledge which makes possible such a mathematical technization is a positive achievement that hinders at the same time the disclosure of the truly philosophical nature of logic. The correct appraisal of this ambiguous phenomenon will explain why the rise of modern logic represents a decisive challenge for the success of Husserl’s late phenomenological project.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference27 articles.
1. Baratelli, G. (2022). What is modern in the crisis of European sciences? Husserl Studies, 38(3), 293–311.
2. Becker, O. (1973). Mathematische Existenz. Untersuchungen zur Logik und Ontologie mathematischer Phänomene. Max Niemeyer Verlag.
3. Benoist, J. (2000). Pourquoi il n’y a pas d’ontologie formelle chez Bolzano. Les études Philosophique, 4, 505–518.
4. Bucci, P. (2000). Husserl e Bolzano. Alle origini della fenomenologia. Unicopoli.
5. Cavallaro, M. (2022). Husserl’s theory of science. In H. Jacobs (Ed.), The Husserlian mind (pp. 433–445). Routledge.