1. Amgoud L., and Parsons S., (2001). Agent dialogue with conflicting preferences. In: Meyer J.-J.C., Tambe M., (eds) Intelligent Agent VIII. Revised papers of the International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages (ATAL-2001) Vol. 2333 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI). Springer-Verlag, pp. 190–205.
2. Dynamic Argument Systems: A Formal Model of Argumentation Processes Based on Situation Calculus
3. Broersen J., Dastani M., Hulstijn J., Huang Z., van der Torre L., (2001). The BOID architecture: conflicts between beliefs, obligations, intentions and desires. In: Mller J.P., Andre E., Sen S. (eds) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents (AGENTS-2001). pp. 9–16.
4. Endriss U., Maudet N., Sadri F., Toni F., (2003). Protocol conformance for logic-based agents. In: Gottlob G., Walsh T. (eds) roceedings of the 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-2003). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 679–684.
5. Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents (FIPA) (2001). Communicative Act Library Specification (XC00037H). http://www.fipa.org/spec.