Assimilating human feedback from autonomous vehicle interaction in reinforcement learning models
-
Published:2024-06-26
Issue:2
Volume:38
Page:
-
ISSN:1387-2532
-
Container-title:Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst
Author:
Fox Richard,Ludvig Elliot A.
Abstract
AbstractA significant challenge for real-world automated vehicles (AVs) is their interaction with human pedestrians. This paper develops a methodology to directly elicit the AV behaviour pedestrians find suitable by collecting quantitative data that can be used to measure and improve an algorithm's performance. Starting with a Deep Q Network (DQN) trained on a simple Pygame/Python-based pedestrian crossing environment, the reward structure was adapted to allow adjustment by human feedback. Feedback was collected by eliciting behavioural judgements collected from people in a controlled environment. The reward was shaped by the inter-action vector, decomposed into feature aspects for relevant behaviours, thereby facilitating both implicit preference selection and explicit task discovery in tandem. Using computational RL and behavioural-science techniques, we harness a formal iterative feedback loop where the rewards were repeatedly adapted based on human behavioural judgments. Experiments were conducted with 124 participants that showed strong initial improvement in the judgement of AV behaviours with the adaptive reward structure. The results indicate that the primary avenue for enhancing vehicle behaviour lies in the predictability of its movements when introduced. More broadly, recognising AV behaviours that receive favourable human judgments can pave the way for enhanced performance.
Funder
UK Research and Innovation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. Bonnefon, J.-F., Shariff, A., & Rahwan, I. (2016). The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science, 352(6293), 1573–1576. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2654 2. Pal, A., Philion, J., Liao, Y.-H., & Fidler, S. (2020). Emergent road rules in multi-agent driving environments. ArXiv201110753 Cs. Accessed: 23 Feb, 2021. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.10753 3. Chater, N., Misyak, J., Watson, D., Griffiths, N., & Mouzakitis, A. (2018). Negotiating the traffic: can cognitive science help make autonomous vehicles a reality? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(2), 93–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.008 4. Ritchie, O. T., Watson, D. G., Griffiths, N., Misyak, J., Chater, N., Xu, Z., & Mouzakitis, A. (2019). How should autonomous vehicles overtake other drivers? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 66, 406–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.016 5. Knox, W. B., Allievi, A., Banzhaf, H., Schmitt, F., & Stone, P. (2021). Reward (Mis)design for autonomous driving. ArXiv210413906 Cs. Accessed 26 Jul, 2021. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.13906
|
|