Abstract
AbstractIt is essential for agents to work together with others to accomplish common objectives, without pre-programmed coordination rules or previous knowledge of the current teammates, a challenge known as ad-hoc teamwork. In these systems, an agent estimates the algorithm of others in an on-line manner in order to decide its own actions for effective teamwork. A common approach is to assume a set of possible types and parameters for teammates, reducing the problem into estimating parameters and calculating distributions over types. Meanwhile, agents often must coordinate in a decentralised fashion to complete tasks that are displaced in an environment (e.g., in foraging, de-mining, rescue or fire control), where each member autonomously chooses which task to perform. By harnessing this knowledge, better estimation techniques can be developed. Hence, we present On-line Estimators for Ad-hoc Task Execution (OEATE), a novel algorithm for teammates’ type and parameter estimation in decentralised task execution. We show theoretically that our algorithm can converge to perfect estimations, under some assumptions, as the number of tasks increases. Additionally, we run experiments for a diverse configuration set in the level-based foraging domain over full and partial observability, and in a “capture the prey” game. We obtain a lower error in parameter and type estimation than previous approaches and better performance in the number of completed tasks for some cases. In fact, we evaluate a variety of scenarios via the increasing number of agents, scenario sizes, number of items, and number of types, showing that we can overcome previous works in most cases considering the estimation process, besides robustness to an increasing number of types and even to an erroneous set of potential types.
Funder
Lancaster University
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference41 articles.
1. Albrecht, S., Crandall, J., & Ramamoorthy, S. (2015). An empirical study on the practical impact of prior beliefs over policy types. In Proceedings of the 29th AAAI conference on artificial intelligence.
2. Albrecht, S., & Stone, P. (2017). Reasoning about hypothetical agent behaviours and their parameters. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, AAMAS’17, May 2017.
3. Albrecht, S. V., & Ramamoorthy, S. (2016). Exploiting causality for selective belief filtering in dynamic bayesian networks. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 55.
4. Albrecht, S. V., & Ramamoorthy, S. (2013). A game-theoretic model and best-response learning method for ad hoc coordination in multiagent systems. Technical report, The University of Edinburgh, February 2013.
5. Albrecht, S. V., & Stone, P. (2018). Autonomous agents modelling other agents: A comprehensive survey and open problems. Artificial Intelligence, 258, 66–95.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献