Abstract
AbstractDue to climate change and the increasing scarcity of resources, the sustainability performance of companies is increasingly becoming the focus of science and practice. Consequently, bicriteria energy-efficient production planning under price-dynamic electricity tariffs—e.g., real-time-pricing (RTP) or time-of-use (TOU)—is meanwhile well established, often fathoming the tradeoffs between electricity costs of production and another criterion such as makespan. However, tradeoffs between electricity costs and electricity consumption in general are rarely the focus of such analyses. So-called green power purchase agreements (PPAs), which are becoming increasingly popular in the European business community as a means of improving corporate sustainability performance, are also largely ignored. Thus, for the first time in the scientific literature, we put this type of electricity tariff to the test by analyzing the tradeoffs between electricity costs and electricity consumption in a lot-sizing and scheduling context. Here, we additionally consider a real-world redox flow battery storage system that may be the system of the future, which is also new to the literature on lot-sizing and scheduling. Even more: due to the complex nature of our bicriteria mixed-integer problem, we develop and present suitable heuristics. These include an energy-efficient allocation heuristic in the case of PPA and, among others, a fix-relax-and-optimize heuristic combined with a decomposition approach in the case of RTP and TOU. Ultimately, a scenario analysis demonstrates the performance of these heuristics.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Decision Sciences
Reference54 articles.
1. Albadi, M., & El-Saadany, E. (2008). A summary of demand response in electricity markets. Electric Power Systems Research, 78(11), 1989–1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2008.04.002
2. Baboli, P., Moghaddam, M., & Eghbal, M. (2011). Present status and future trends in enabling demand response programs. In IEEE power and energy society general meeting 2011 (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/PES.2011.6039608
3. Bänsch, K., Busse, J., Meisel, F., Rieck, J., Scholz, S., Volling, T., & Wichmann, M. (2021). Energy-aware decision support models in production environments: A systematic literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 159, 107456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107456
4. BEIS. (2022). Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy . Policy paper—Contracts for Difference. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/contracts-for-difference/contract-for-difference.
5. Biel, K., & Glock, C. (2016). Systematic literature review of decision support models for energy-efficient production planning. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 101, 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.08.021
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献