Abstract
AbstractRisk aggregation and capital allocation are of paramount importance in business, as they play critical roles in pricing, risk management, project financing, performance management, regulatory supervision, etc. The state-of-the-art practice often includes two steps: (i) determine standalone capital requirements for individual business lines and aggregate them at a corporate level; and (ii) allocate the total capital back to individual lines of business or at more granular levels. There are three pitfalls with such a practice, namely, lack of consistency, negligence of cost of capital, and disentanglement of allocated capitals from standalone capitals. In this paper, we introduce a holistic approach that aims to strike a balance of optimality by taking into account competing interests of various stakeholders and conflicting priorities in a corporate hierarchy. While unconventional in its objective, the new approach results in an allocation of diversification benefit, which conforms to the diversification strategy of many risk management frameworks including regulatory capital and economic capital. The holistic capital setting and allocation principle provides a remedy to aforementioned problems with the existing two-step industry practice.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Decision Sciences
Reference45 articles.
1. Anderson, J. J., & Thompson, H. E. (1971). Financial implications of over-reserving in nonlife insurance companies. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 38(3), 333–342. https://doi.org/10.2307/251398.
2. Arbenz, P., Hummel, C., & Mainik, G. (2012). Copula based hierarchical risk aggregation through sample reordering. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 51(1), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2012.03.009.
3. Asimit, V., Peng, L., Wang, R., & Yu, A. (2019). An efficient approach to quantile capital allocation and sensitivity analysis. Mathematical Finance, 29(4), 1131–1156. https://doi.org/10.1111/mafi.12211.
4. Baione, F., De Angelis, P., & Granito, I. (2020). Capital allocation and RORAC optimization under solvency 2 standard formula. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03543-6.
5. Bauer, D., & Zanjani, G. (2014). The marginal cost of risk in a multi-period risk model (Tech. Rep.). Atlanta, GA: Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献