Abstract
AbstractWe introduce the concepts of the components’ second-order productivities in cooperative games with transferable utility (TU games) with a coalition structure (CS games) and of the components’ second-order payoffs for one-point solutions for CS games as generalizations of the players’ second-order productivities in TU games and of the players’ second-order payoffs for one-point solutions for TU games (Casajus in Discrete Appl Math 304:212–219, 2021). The players’ second-order productivities are conceptualized as second-order marginal contributions, that is, how one player affects another player’s marginal contributions to coalitions containing neither of them by entering these coalitions. The players’ second-order payoffs are conceptualized as the effect of one player leaving the game on the payoff of another player. Analogously, the components’ second-order productivities are conceptualized as their second-order productivities in the game between components; the components’ second-order payoffs are conceptualized as their second-order payoffs in the game between components. We show that the Owen value is the unique efficient one-point solution for CS games that reflects the players’ and the components’ second-order productivities in terms of their second-order payoffs.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Decision Sciences
Reference24 articles.
1. Albizuri, M. J. (2008). Axiomatizations of the Owen value without efficiency. Mathematical Social Sciences, 55, 78–89.
2. Alonso-Meijide, J. M., Casas-Méndez, B., González-Rueda, A. M., & Lorenzo-Freire, S. (2014). Axiomatic of the Shapley value of a game with a priori unions. TOP, 22, 749–770.
3. Alonso-Meijide, J. M., & Fiestras-Janeiro, M. G. (2002). Modification of the Banzhaf value for games with a coalition structure. Annals of Operations Research, 109, 213–227.
4. Aumann, R. J., & Drèze, J. H. (1974). Cooperative games with coalition structures. International Journal of Game Theory, 3, 217–237.
5. Banzhaf, J. F. (1965). Weighted voting does not work: a mathematical analysis. Rutgers Law Review, 19, 317–343.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献