Abstract
AbstractThe execution of a project is often distributed among multiple sites. The planning of such a project includes selecting a specific site for the execution of each of the project’s activities and allocating the available resource units to the execution of these activities over time. While some resource units are available at a certain site only, others can be moved across sites. Given the spatial distance between sites, transportation times arise if a resource unit must be transported from one site to another or if the output of an activity must be transported to another site. This planning problem has been introduced in recent literature as the multi-site resource-constrained project scheduling problem. We present a continuous-time model and devise a matheuristic for this planning problem. The continuous-time model uses, among others, binary variables to impose a sequence between activities assigned to the same resource units. In the matheuristic, the binary restrictions on these variables are initially relaxed and iteratively restored for the subset of activities scheduled in the current iteration. We compare the performance of the continuous-time model and the matheuristic to the performance of a discrete-time model and several metaheuristics from the literature using two sets of test instances from the literature. Both the continuous-time model and the matheuristic derive on average superior solutions in shorter average running times than the reference approaches.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Decision Sciences
Reference19 articles.
1. Almeida, B. F., Correia, I., & Saldanha-da-Gama, F. (2016). Priority-based heuristics for the multi-skill resource constrained project scheduling problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 57, 91–103.
2. Boschetti, M. A., Maniezzo, V., Roffilli, M., & Bolufé Röhler, A. (2009). Matheuristics: optimization, simulation and control. In C. Blum, L. Di Gaspero, A. Roli, M. Sampels, & A. Schaerf (Eds.), International Workshop on Hybrid Metaheuristics (pp. 171–177). Springer.
3. Cordeau, J. F., Gendreau, M., Laporte, G., Potvin, J. Y., & Semet, F. (2002). A guide to vehicle routing heuristics. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53(5), 512–522.
4. Della Croce, F., Grosso, A. C., & Salassa, F. (2013). Matheuristics: Embedding MILP solvers into heuristic algorithms for combinatorial optimization problems. In P. Siarry (Ed.), Heuristics: Theory and Applications (pp. 53–67). Nova Science Publishers.
5. Demeulemeester, E. L., & Herroelen, W. (2002). Project Scheduling: A Research Handbook. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献