Abstract
AbstractWe analyse systemic risk in the core global banking system using a new network-based spectral eigen-pair method, which treats network failure as a dynamical system stability problem. This is compared with market price-based Systemic Risk Indexes (SRIs), viz. Marginal Expected Shortfall (MES), Delta Conditional Value-at-Risk (Delta-CoVaR), and Conditional Capital Shortfall Measure of Systemic Risk (SRISK) in a cross-border setting. Unlike paradoxical market price based risk measures, which underestimate risk during periods of asset price booms, the eigen-pair method based on bilateral balance sheet data gives early-warning of instability in terms of the tipping point that is analogous to the R number in epidemic models. For this regulatory capital thresholds are used. Furthermore, network centrality measures identify systemically important and vulnerable banking systems. Market price-based SRIs are contemporaneous with the crisis and they are found to covary with risk measures like VaR and betas.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Decision Sciences
Reference81 articles.
1. Acharya, V., Engle, R., & Richardson, M. (2012). Capital shortfall: A new approach to ranking and regulating systemic risks. American Economic Review, 102(3), 59–64.
2. Acharya, V., Pedersen, L., Philippon, T., & Richardson, M. (2017). Measuring systemic risk. Review of Financial Studies, 1, 2–47.
3. Acharya, V. V., & Stefen, S. (2012). Analyzing systemic risk of the European banking sector. Handbook on systemic risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Adrian, T., & Brunnermeier, M. (2011). CoVaR. Working Paper, Princeton University and Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
5. Adrian, T., & Shin, H. (2010). Liquidity and leverage. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 19(3), 418–37.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献