Abstract
AbstractIn the circular economy era, this study addresses sustainable business management for high-investment and long-life cycle projects, where accurate and reliable assessments are crucial to ensuring successful outcomes. The objective is to elevate the reliability of assessments by introducing a novel decision-making method that, for the first time, integrates time-based satisfaction and risk factors simultaneously. We propose a 3-phase multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method, which combines fuzzy MCDM comprising fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal situation (TOPSIS), Kano model, and failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) techniques, to handle reliable assessments effectively. Our method is distinct in its incorporation of time-based satisfaction weights derived from Kano model, emphasising decision-makers’ criteria preferences in short, medium, and long terms. Furthermore, we introduce risk-discounted weights by using FMEA to tune criteria scores. The method is validated via a numerical example case, assessing and selecting the most appropriate hydrogen storage method for lightweight vehicles. The results suggest that cryo-compressed hydrogen tank with 250–350 bar and at cryogenic temperature is the most suitable storage method. Health & safety with a weight of 0.5318 emerges as the most important main criterion, and permeation & leakage with a weight of 0.4008 is the most important sub-criterion. To bridge the gap between theoretical research and practical application, we transform the new method into a user-friendly web application with graphical user interface (GUI). End-users can conduct reliable assessments and foster sustainable business management through informed decision-making.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference56 articles.
1. Aguilar Esteva, L. C., Kasliwal, A., Kinzler, M. S., Kim, H. C., & Keoleian, G. A. (2021). Circular economy framework for automobiles: Closing energy and material loops. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 25(4), 877–889.
2. Amor, S. B., Belaid, F., Benkraiem, R., Ramdani, B., & Guesmi, K. (2023). Multi-criteria classification, sorting, and clustering: a bibliometric review and research agenda. Annals of Operations Research, 325(2), 771–793.
3. Avikal, S., Jain, R., & Mishra, P. (2014). A Kano model, AHP and M-TOPSIS method-based technique for disassembly line balancing under fuzzy environment. Applied Soft Computing, 25, 519–529.
4. Bai, C., Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2022). Circular economy and circularity supplier selection: A fuzzy group decision approach. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2037779
5. Berger, C., Blauth, R., & Boger, D. (1993). Kano’s methods for understanding customer-defined quality. Center for Quality Management Journal, 2(4), 3–36.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献