Optimal reimbursement limitation for a health plan

Author:

Baione Fabio,Biancalana Davide,Menzietti MassimilianoORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe goal of this paper is the assessment of an optimal reimbursement strategy for employer-based health insurance plans (HP), that cover several categories of medical services. Indeed, a health plan may offer several cost-sharing provisions for these categories, and the “Percent Expense Paid” by the plan also known as “Actuarial Value” represents a summary measure of the protection provided. Starting from a wide industrial applied model in insurance for rate-making, the generalized linear models (GLM), we estimate the expected value and variance of the health expenditure for each category. Moreover, different reimbursement rules (e.g. deductibles, co-payments, policy limits, etc.) involve a change of the “Actuarial Value” calculated as the ratio between the benefits paid by the plan (i.e. reimbursement amounts) and the expenses paid by policyholders (i.e. expenditures). The latter is the percentage of expenditure reimbursed by the plan and is sometimes defined in actuarial literature as Indicated Deductible Relativity (IDR); an IDR can be calculated for each category covered by the Health Plan or per policyholder and is a commonly used method for scoring the benefits of health insurance. Hence, we calculate the optimal IDR for each category, using the optimization problem proposed by de by Finetti (Il problema dei pieni, Giornale dell’istituto italiano degli attuari, 1940) in the context of proportional reinsurance. The goal is the minimization of the variance of the total reimbursement of the Health Plan by fixing the total gain. Furthermore, we propose a numerical application to a real dataset, containing observed expenditures of an Italian HP.

Funder

Università degli Studi di Salerno

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management Science and Operations Research,General Decision Sciences

Reference32 articles.

1. Carroll H., Mange J. (2017). The actuarial role in self-insurance: A health section strategic initiative. In Health Watch Issue 84, SOA.

2. Clemente, G. P., Savelli, N., Spedicato, G. A., & Zappa, D. (2022). Modeling general practitioners’ total drug costs through GAMLSS and collective risk models. North American Actuarial Journal, 26(4), 610–625.

3. Daykin, C. D., Pentikainen, T., & Pesonen, M. (1993). Practical risk theory for actuaries. Chapman and Hall/CRC.

4. De Finetti, B., (1940). Il problema dei pieni. Giornale dell’istituto italiano degli attuari

5. Duan, N., Manning, W. G., Morris, C. N., & Newhouse, J. P. (1983). A comparison of alternative models for the demand for medical care. J of Business and Economic Statistics, 1, 115–126.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3