Abstract
AbstractThe goal of this paper is the assessment of an optimal reimbursement strategy for employer-based health insurance plans (HP), that cover several categories of medical services. Indeed, a health plan may offer several cost-sharing provisions for these categories, and the “Percent Expense Paid” by the plan also known as “Actuarial Value” represents a summary measure of the protection provided. Starting from a wide industrial applied model in insurance for rate-making, the generalized linear models (GLM), we estimate the expected value and variance of the health expenditure for each category. Moreover, different reimbursement rules (e.g. deductibles, co-payments, policy limits, etc.) involve a change of the “Actuarial Value” calculated as the ratio between the benefits paid by the plan (i.e. reimbursement amounts) and the expenses paid by policyholders (i.e. expenditures). The latter is the percentage of expenditure reimbursed by the plan and is sometimes defined in actuarial literature as Indicated Deductible Relativity (IDR); an IDR can be calculated for each category covered by the Health Plan or per policyholder and is a commonly used method for scoring the benefits of health insurance. Hence, we calculate the optimal IDR for each category, using the optimization problem proposed by de by Finetti (Il problema dei pieni, Giornale dell’istituto italiano degli attuari, 1940) in the context of proportional reinsurance. The goal is the minimization of the variance of the total reimbursement of the Health Plan by fixing the total gain. Furthermore, we propose a numerical application to a real dataset, containing observed expenditures of an Italian HP.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Salerno
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Decision Sciences
Reference32 articles.
1. Carroll H., Mange J. (2017). The actuarial role in self-insurance: A health section strategic initiative. In Health Watch Issue 84, SOA.
2. Clemente, G. P., Savelli, N., Spedicato, G. A., & Zappa, D. (2022). Modeling general practitioners’ total drug costs through GAMLSS and collective risk models. North American Actuarial Journal, 26(4), 610–625.
3. Daykin, C. D., Pentikainen, T., & Pesonen, M. (1993). Practical risk theory for actuaries. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
4. De Finetti, B., (1940). Il problema dei pieni. Giornale dell’istituto italiano degli attuari
5. Duan, N., Manning, W. G., Morris, C. N., & Newhouse, J. P. (1983). A comparison of alternative models for the demand for medical care. J of Business and Economic Statistics, 1, 115–126.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献