Abstract
AbstractIn the past 10 years, a large number of consensus-reaching approaches for group decision making (GDM) have been proposed. While these methods either focus on the cost of the consensus reaching or the convergency of the consensus process, the consensus efficiency has long been ignored. Meanwhile, the measurements of consensus threshold are often determined by some subjective and intuitive judgements, such as management experience and estimations for the degree of satisfaction, which lack a theoretical foundation. In management applications, how to measure consensus and how to evaluate a consensus reaching method are also ambiguous. To tackle these questions, we introduce efficiency measures into the consensus reaching process of GDM and achieve a comprehensive evaluation of current consensus methods through an efficiency analysis of consensus costs and consensus improvement. From the perspective of efficiency, we propose a benchmark in consensus reaching by data envelopment analysis without explicit input benchmark models, and then present an objective method for consensus threshold determination in GDM. Finally, we use numerical examples to illustrate the usability of our method.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Decision Sciences
Reference58 articles.
1. Bai, X., Shi, P., & Liu, Y. (2014). Society: realizing china’s urban dream. Nature, 509(7499), 158–160.
2. Cabrerizo, F. J., Pérez, I. J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2010). Managing the consensus in group decision making in an unbalanced fuzzy linguistic context with incomplete information. Knowledge-Based Systems, 23, 169–181.
3. Chao X.R., Decision Behavior and Consensus Reaching in Large-Scale Group Decision Making with Heterogeneous Preference Structures. Ph.D thesis, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China, 2017.
4. Chao, X., Kou, G., Li, T., & Peng, Y. (2018). Jie Ke versus AlphaGo: A ranking approach using decision making method for large-scale data with incomplete information. European Journal of Operational Research, 265(1), 239–247.
5. Chao, X., Peng, Y., & Kou, G. (2017). A similarity measure-based optimization model for group decision making with multiplicative and fuzzy preference relations. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 12(1), 26–40.
Cited by
52 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献