Abstract
AbstractThis study analyses the implications of Jeffery–Lindley’s paradox and Global Financial Crisis (GFC) for the operational aspect of macroeconomic policy coordination for financial stability. Using a Bayesian Vector Auto-regressive model and data from Jan 1985 to June 2016, our key findings suggest that the claim of macroeconomic policy interaction, interdependence and significance of coordinated policy operations for the financial stability holds its ground. The argument in the support for policy coordination for financial stability was found to be robust against the Jeffreys–Lindley’s paradox and in the Post-GFC era. A profound practical, operational and philosophical implication of this study is the positive aspects of Jeffreys–Lindley’s paradox and the possibility of employing the Frequentist and Bayesian estimation techniques as complementing rather competing frameworks.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Decision Sciences
Reference67 articles.
1. Aarle, B. V., Engwerda, J., & Plasmans, J. (2002). Monetary and fiscal policy interaction in the EMU: A dynamic game approach. Annals of Operations Research, 109(1–4), 229–264.
2. Airaudo, M., Cardani, R., & Lansing, K. J. (2011). Monetary policy and asset prices with belief-driven fluctuations and news shocks. Philadelphia: LeBow College of Business, Drexel University.
3. Andrew, H. H., Libich, J., & Stehlik, P. (2011). Welfare improving coordination of fiscal and monetary policy. AUCO Czech Economic Review, 5, 7–26.
4. Ardagna, S. (2009). Financial markets behaviour around episodes of large changes in the fiscal stance. European Economic Review, 53, 37–55.
5. Arnold, I. J. M., & Vrugt, E. B. (2010). Treasury bond volatility and uncertainty about monetary policy. The Financial Review, 45, 707–728.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献