Abstract
AbstractIt is well-known that minimally repaired systems are characterized by non-homogeneous Poisson processes. When the underlying lifetime distribution function or its associated intensity function is completely known, the statistical inference of the cumulative number of failures/repairs is made through some standard techniques. On the other hand, when the parametric form of the lifetime distribution or the intensity function is not known, non-parametric inference techniques such as non-parametric maximum likelihood estimate (NPMLE) and kernel-based estimates are employed. Since these techniques are based on the underlying lifetime data, the resulting estimates of the cumulative number of failures/repairs with respect to the system operation time are discontinuous and troublesome in assessing the reliability measures such as reliability function and mean time to failure, etc. In this paper, we propose a novel lifetime analysis of the repairable systems via Daubechies wavelets. More specifically, we generalize the seminal Daubechies wavelet estimate by Kuhl and Bhairgond (Winter Simul Conf Proc 1:562–571, 2000) by combining the ideas on NPMLE and KMBs. In both simulation experiments and real data analyses, we investigate applicability of our Daubechies wavelet-based approaches and compare them with the conventional non-parametric methods.
Funder
Establishment of University Fellowships towards the Creation of Science Technology Innovation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Abdel-Ghaly, A. A., Chan, P. Y., & Littlewood, B. (1986). Evaluation of competing software reliability predictions. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE–12, 950–967.
2. Achcar, J. A., Dey, D. K., & Niverthi, M. (1998). A Bayesian approach using nonhomogeneous Poisson processes for software reliability models, Frontiers in Reliability, 1–18. Singapore: World Scientific.
3. Ascher, H., & Feingold, H. (1984). Repairable Systems Reliability. New York: Marcel Dekker.
4. Aven, T. (1983). Optimal replacement under a minimal repair strategy-a general failure model. Advances in Applied Probability, 15(1), 198–211.
5. Aven, T., & Jensen, U. (2000). A general minimal repair model. Journal of Applied Probability, 37(1), 187–197.