Abstract
AbstractThe paper focuses on safety and simplicity of unmanned aircraft longitudinal control and proposes a new combination of total energy control (TECS) and conventional control. The introduced new modified total energy control (TECSMOD) method applies IAS priority all the time. IAS is controlled through the elevator while the total energy of the system and so the altitude is maintained with throttle. Neither engine fault or stall detection nor switching logic is required while stall is prevented keeping the solution simple and safe. To prove the viability of the new concept it is compared to a conventional multiple zone PI controller and the TECS solution in simulation and real flight tests. First, the six degrees of freedom simulation model of the Sindy test UAV (developed and built in Institute for Computer Science and Control, HUN-REN, Hungary) is verified comparing its inputs and outputs to flight results. Then a simulation campaign is done for all three controllers with special test cases which can be critical according to the literature. Finally, real flight test comparison is done considering IAS and altitude tracking and engine fault handling. The new method was the best in IAS tracking with acceptable results in altitude tracking and successful stall prevention upon engine fault (without any fault detection or switching). Future improvements can be fine tuning for improved altitude tracking with the price of decreased IAS tracking performance and the introduction of a glideslope tracking mode for landing scenarios.
Funder
European Union
Ministry of Innovation and Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Artificial Intelligence,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Mechanical Engineering,Control and Systems Engineering,Software
Reference36 articles.
1. Anandakumar, A., Bernstein, D., Goel, A.: Adaptive energy control of longitudinal aircraft dynamics. In: AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum (2022). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2022-0965
2. Argyle, M.E., Beard, R.W.: Nonlinear total energy control for the longitudinal dynamics of an aircraft. In: 2016 American Control Conference (ACC), pp 6741–6746 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2016.7526733
3. Bahri, S.: Longitudinal flight control laws for high aspect ratio light utility aircraft. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1130(1):012,026 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1130/1/012026
4. Balas, G., Ganguli, S.: A TECS alternative using robust multivariable control. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit (2001). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2001-4022, URL https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2001-4022, https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2001-4022
5. Bauer, P.: Comparison of Aircraft Waypoint Guidance and Tracking Strategies. In: In Proc. of 9th European Workshop on Advanced Control and Diagnosis (ACD 2011), Budapest, Hungary (2011)