Polyfunctional argument markers in Ket

Author:

Carter MatthewORCID

Abstract

AbstractPolyfunctionality refers to cases in which the same formal material is systematically reused with different functions. It represents a type of complexity of exponence, wherein there is a non-one-to-one mapping between function and form. Much recent work in morphology has emphasized the role of implicative structure in resolving the communicative challenges associated with complex form-function mappings. However, previous work has focused almost entirely on complexity of exponence as a challenge for the speaker predicting novel forms (knowing how to encode information), and very little on the challenge for the listener in decoding novel forms. It also has focused almost exclusively on inflectional paradigms, and has not explored how other types of implicative structure might be important in languages with diverse morphological systems. This paper investigates the role of syntagmatic (i.e. word-internal) implicative structure in Ket (Yeniseian, Siberia), a polysynthetic language with numerous polyfunctional markers. It is shown that such markers are organized into networks of implicative relations with one another, wherein less polyfunctional markers along a scale of polyfunctionality disambiguate the function of more polyfunctional markers. This allows uncertainty with regard to their function in any particular instance to remain low. The Ket data make wider typological predictions for the relationship between complexity of exponence and implicative structure.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Language and Linguistics

Reference65 articles.

1. Ackerman, F., & Bonami, O. (2017). Systemic polyfunctionality and morphology-syntax. In N. Gisborne & A. Hippisley (Eds.), Defaults in morphological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

2. Ackerman, F., Blevins, J. P., & Malouf, R. (2009). Parts and wholes: patterns of relatedness in complex morphological systems and why they matter. In J. Blevins & J. Blevins (Eds.), Analogy in grammar: form and acquisition (Vol. 54, p. 82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

3. Anderson, S. R. (2015). Dimensions of morphological complexity. In M. Baerman, D. Brown, & G. Corbett (Eds.), Understanding and measuring morphological complexity (pp. 11–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

4. Arkadiev, P. & Gardani, F. (Eds.) (2020). The complexities of morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

5. Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by itself: stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Typology of Tonal Exponence;Morphology;2024-06-17

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3