Morphological autonomy and the long-term vitality of morphomes: stem-final consonant loss in Romance verbs and paradigmatic analogy-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Morphological autonomy and the long-term vitality of morphomes: stem-final consonant loss in Romance verbs and paradigmatic analogy

Published:2023-04-03 Issue:2 Volume:33 Page:153-187
ISSN:1871-5621
Container-title:Morphology
language:en
Short-container-title:Morphology

Author:

Herce Borja^ORCID

Abstract

AbstractMorphologists of different backgrounds disagree with respect to the degree of autonomy of the morphological component of language from syntax and semantics. A precise and objective quantification of the diachronic productivity of Romance morphomes is the piece of evidence most crucially missing from this debate. On the basis of 502 morphophonological innovations associated with the loss of stem-final consonants across 63 Romance varieties, this paper quantifies the degree of productivity of different morphomes (the N pattern is found to be the most productive one) and of morphomic templates generally (15% of novel stem alternations are found to abide by them). Although a strong attraction effect is detectable for morphomes, the numbers suggest that the morphological autonomy and longevity of stem alternations in the family might have been somewhat overstated. For an optimal account of the morphological innovations observed, reference to inherited morphomic structure, semantic structure, and to frequency of use are needed in similar proportions.

Funder

University of Zurich

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Language and Linguistics

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11525-023-09406-7.pdf

Reference96 articles.

1. Ackerman, F., Blevins, J. P., & Malouf, R. (2009). Parts and wholes: implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms. In J. P. Blevins & J. Blevins (Eds.), Analogy in grammar: form and acquisition (pp. 54–81). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

2. Alton, J. B. & Vittur, F. (1968). L ladin dla Val Badia: Beitrag zu einer Grammatik des Dolomitenladinischen. Brixen: A. Weger.

3. Andersen, H. (1980). Morphological change: towards a typology. In J. Fisiak (Ed.), Historical morphology (pp. 1–50). The Hague: Mouton.

4. Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by itself: stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge: MIT Press.

5. Barbu Ana Maria (2008). Romanian lexical data bases: Inflected and syllabic forms dictionaries. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008), Marrakech, Morocco: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).