Abstract
AbstractPrevious corpus studies have shown that the English spelling system is ‘morpho-graphic’ (Berg and Aronoff 2017) in that affixes are spelt in a consistent way (e.g., ‹ous› in famous) that distinguishes them from homophonous word endings without grammatical function (e.g., ‹us› in bonus). The present paper investigates if English spellers apply these regularities to the spelling of novel words implicitly and whether the application of those regularities is modulated by experience with the English writing system.Participants with varying degrees of expertise in the English writing system were asked to spell novel words ending in /əs/, which were presented orally in either an adjective context (i.e., biasing towards the affix spelling ‹ous›) or a noun context (i.e., biasing towards an alternative spelling such as ‹us›). The results showed that the adjective context elicited significantly more ‹ous› spellings than the noun context, indicating that participants applied morpho-graphic spelling regularities to novel words to mark the appropriate lexical category. Additionally, there was a modulation by spelling ability: The higher participants’ expertise in the English spelling system was, the more novel words they spelt according to morpho-graphic spelling regularities.In conclusion, English spellers are aware of the morpho-graphic spelling regularities without explicit instruction and apply these to novel words. They gradually induce the regularities from the input, which results in more robust rule application with increased experience and expertise in the English writing system.
Funder
Technische Universität Braunschweig
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. Abrahantes, J. C., & Aerts, M. (2012). A solution to separation for clustered binary data. Statistical Modelling, 12(1), 3–27.
2. Andrews, S., & Lo, S. (2013). Is morphological priming stronger for transparent than opaque words? It depends on individual differences in spelling and vocabulary. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 279–296.
3. Aronoff, M., Berg, K., & Heyer, V. (2016). Some implications of English spelling for morphological processing. The Mental Lexicon, 11, 164–185.
4. Audacity Team (2017). Audacity(R): Free audio editor and recorder [Computer application]. Version 2.1.3 retrieved May 22nd 2017 from https://audacityteam.org/.
5. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (Release 2, English version 2.5. [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献