Author:
Maestre-Valero José Francisco,Imbernón-Mulero Alberto,Martínez-Alvarez Victoriano,Ben Abdallah Saker,Gallego-Elvira Belén
Abstract
AbstractDesalinated seawater (DSW) is currently considered a reliable alternative supply of agricultural water in south-eastern Spain able to alleviate the looming water crisis as it buffers natural hydro-climatic volatility. However, irrigation with DSW may pose an agronomic risk because reverse osmosis permeates usually have high boron concentrations, representing a real toxicity damage risk for sensitive crops. Boron reductions to at least 0.5 mg/L, either on-farm or at the coastal seawater desalination plant, should be performed before irrigating with DSW, especially in areas with sensitive crops. The regional economic impact of reducing boron in diverse irrigation districts covered with different crops has never been evaluated. In this article, that impact is analyzed considering three scenarios replacing traditional irrigation water resources with DSW, and two boron reduction technologies: reverse osmosis membranes (RO) and ion exchange resins (IX).The results reflected that: (i) boron reduction by IX is notably cheaper than by RO; (ii) at seawater desalination plant scale, the boron reduction cost remains constant regardless of the crop type, whereas at on-farm scale the higher the surface area covered by vegetables the lower the boron reduction cost; and (iii) the volume of by-product generated in resin regeneration is 40 times lower than that in the RO process, so consequently its handling and management would be far easier and less costly. Additionally, the study corroborates that the combined use of DSW with traditional resources is the most economically efficient option from the different perspectives of the study, compared to irrigating with DSW alone.
Funder
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference60 articles.
1. Alnouri SY, Linke P, El-Halwagi MM (2017) Accounting for central and distributed zero liquid discharge options in interplant water network design. J Clean Prod 171:644–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.236
2. Arafat H (2017) Desalination sustainability: A technical, socioeconomic, and environmental approach. Elsevier, United States
3. Backer SN, Bouaziz I, Kallayi N, Thomas RT, Preethikumar G, Takriff MS, Laoui T, Atieh MA (2022) Review: brine solution: current status, future management and technology development. Sustainability 14:6752. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116752
4. Barrington DJ, Ho G (2014) Towards zero liquid discharge: the use of water auditing to identify water conservation measures. J Clean Prod 66:571–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.065
5. Bazargan A (2018) A multidisciplinary introduction to desalination. Stylus Publishing, LLC