Author:
Paredes Paula,Petry Mirta T.,Oliveira Cristina M.,Montoya Francisco,López-Urrea Ramón,Pereira Luis S.
Abstract
AbstractThis paper provides an overview of the research carried out over the last 25 years on the FAO56 single and basal crop coefficients of subtropical and tropical orchards and plantations of cactus pear, dragon fruit, fig, jujube, passion fruit, pomegranate, cape gooseberry, cherimoya, guava, longan, lychee, mango, papaya, acerola, carambola, cashew, cacao, coffee, jaboticaba, jatropha, macadamia, açai palm, coconut, date palm, guayule, oil palm, peach palm, ramie and rubber tree. The main objective of this review is to update standard single crop coefficients (Kc) and basal crop coefficients (Kcb) and complete the Kc and Kcb values tabulated in FAO56. Kc is the ratio between the non-stressed crop evapotranspiration (ETc) and the grass reference evapotranspiration (ETo), and Kcb is the ratio between the crop transpiration (Tc) and the ETo. When selecting and analysing the literature, only studies that used the FAO Penman–Monteith equation, or another equation well related to the former to compute ETo were considered, while ETc or Tc were obtained from accurate field measurements on crops under pristine (non-stress cropping conditions) or eustress (“good stress”) conditions. Articles meeting these conditions were selected to provide data for updating Kc and Kcb under standard conditions. The related description of orchards and plantations refers to crop cultivar and rootstock, irrigation systems and scheduling, planting spacing, fraction of ground cover (fc) by the crops, crop height (h), crop age and training systems, as Kc and Kcb values depend on these characteristics. To define the standard Kc and Kcb values of the selected crops, the values collected in the literature were compared with previously tabulated standard Kc and Kcb values. The updated tabulated values are transferable to other locations and climates and can be used to calculate and model crop water requirements, primarily for irrigation planning and scheduling, and thereby supporting of improved water use and savings, which is the overall aim of the current review.
Funder
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
NextGenerationEU
Education, Culture and Sports Council, Spain
Universidade de Lisboa
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference129 articles.
1. Alamoud AI, Mohammad FS, Al-Hamed SA, Alabdulkaber AM (2012) Reference evapotranspiration and date palm water use in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Int Res J Agric Sci Soil Sci 2:155–169
2. Alharbi A, Alzoheiry A, Ghazaw YM (2016) Estimation of water requirements and crop coefficients for date palm in Qassim region, Saudi Arabia. J Agric Vet Sci 9:187–196
3. Allen RG, Pereira LS (2009) Estimating crop coefficients from fraction of ground cover and height. Irrig Sci 28:17–34
4. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Howell TA, Jensen ME (2011) Evapotranspiration information reporting: I. Factors governing measurement accuracy. Agric Water Manag 98:899–920
5. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrig Drain Paper 56, FAO, Rome, 300 pp