Prevalence Estimates of Symptom Feigning and Malingering in Spain

Author:

Puente-López Esteban,Pina DavidORCID,López-López Reyes,Ordi Héctor González,Bošković Irena,Merten Thomas

Abstract

AbstractSymptom feigning and malingering should be evaluated in forensic contexts due to their important socio-economic consequences. Despite this, to date, there is little research in Spain that evaluates its prevalence. The aim of this study was to investigate this issue using the perception of the general population, students, and professionals of medicine and forensic psychology. Three adapted questionnaires were applied to a total of 1003 participants (61.5% women) from 5 different groups. Approximately two-thirds of participants reported knowing someone who feigned symptoms, and one-third disclosed feigning symptoms themselves in the past. Headache/migraine, neck pain, and anxious–depressive symptoms were the most commonly chosen. Experts in psychology and forensic medicine estimated a prevalence of 20 to 40% of non-credible symptom presentations in their work settings and reported not having sufficient means to assess the distorted presentation of symptoms with certainty. Professionals and laypersons alike acknowledge that non-credible symptom presentations (like feigning or malingering) are relevant in Spain and occur at a non-trivial rate, which compares with estimates in other parts of the world.

Funder

Universidad de Murcia

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference42 articles.

1. Arce, R. (2017). Análisis de contenido de las declaraciones de testigos: Evaluación de la validez científica y judicial de la hipótesis y la prueba [Content analysis of witness statements: Assessment of the scientific and judicial validity of the hypothesis and the evidence]. Acción Psicológica, 14(2), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.14.1.21347

2. Arce, R., & Fariña, F. (2001). Construcción y validación de un procedimiento basado en una tarea de conocimiento para la medida de la huella psíquica en víctimas de delitos: la entrevista forense [Construction and validation of a procedure based on a knowledge task for the measurement of the psychic imprint in crime victims: the forensic interview] (Unpublished manuscript). Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.

3. Arce, R., & Fariña, F. (2004). Obtención del testimonio y evaluación de la veracidad de las declaraciones [Obtaining testimony and assessing the veracity of statements]. In G. Buela-Casal, D. Bunce, & E. Jiménez (Eds.), Manual de Psicología Forense (pp. 599–607). Biblioteca Nueva.

4. Arce, R., & Fariña, F. (2005). El Sistema de Evaluación Global (SEG) de la credibilidad del testimonio: Hacia una propuesta integradora [The Global Evaluation System (GES) of the credibility of testimony: Towards an integrative proposal]. In R. Arce, F. Fariña, & M. Novo (Eds.), Psicología jurídica (pp. 103–109). Consellería de Xustiza.

5. Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2008). MMPI–2: Restructured Form (MMPI–2–RF) manual for administration. University of Minnesota Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3