Unlearning, relearning, staying with the trouble: Scenarios and the future of education

Author:

Finch Matt,Bhroin Niamh Ní,Krüger Steffen

Abstract

AbstractIn times of turbulence, uncertainty, novelty, and ambiguity—the so-called TUNA conditions—our experience of the past may prove a poor guide to the future times in which our decisions and their consequences will unfold. Under such conditions, the manufacture of scenarios that are plausible future contexts for a given issue and are designed to enrich strategic thinking by challenging expectations can help to inform decisions and debates. Education is often subject to such debates, as it is, among other things, a way of preparing for what the future holds. This article gives an account of learnings and unlearnings from a scenarios project applying the Oxford Scenario Planning Approach to the digitalization of education in Norwegian schools. It shows how challenging issues raised in the context of distant imagined futures proved to be immediately pertinent in the developing Covid-19 pandemic. This article sets this work in the wider context of education futures and ongoing debate about suitable methodological choices for institutions and communities wishing to explore how we will teach and learn together in times to come. As a wide range of actors explore the possibility of a new social contract for education, the article proposes that future scenarios can provide fresh perspectives on issues that are difficult or even impossible to resolve within current frames of reference, including questions of equity and justice that may be construed differently in times to come.

Funder

University of Oslo

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education

Reference28 articles.

1. Burt, G., & Nair, A. K. (2020). Rigidities of imagination in scenario planning: Strategic foresight through ‘unlearning.’ Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119927

2. Chermack, T. J. (2022). Using scenarios: Scenario planning for improving organizations. Berrett-Koehler.

3. Davis, G. (1998). Creating scenarios for your company’s future [Conference presentation]. In The Shell International 1998 Conference on corporate environmental, health and safety excellence: Bringing sustainable development down to Earth, New York.

4. Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Heath and Company.

5. Dubitzky, W., Kötter, T., Schmidt, O., & Berthold, M. R. (2012). Towards creative information exploration based on Koestler’s concept of bisociation. In M. R. Berthold (Ed.), Bisociative knowledge discovery (pp. 11–32). Springer.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3