The role of mindfulness and autonomous motivation for goal progress and goal adjustment: an intervention study
-
Published:2023-09-02
Issue:6
Volume:47
Page:946-964
-
ISSN:0146-7239
-
Container-title:Motivation and Emotion
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Motiv Emot
Author:
Kappes CathleenORCID, Marion-Jetten Ariane S.ORCID, Taylor GenevièveORCID, Schad Daniel J.ORCID, Dreßler Birte, El-Hayek Samira, Hansemann Jule, Heine Rebecca, Lindner Sarah, Melzner Lena, Meyer Cedric, Pfister Benjamin, Rogowski Kaja, Rose Rebekka, Simson Katharina, Stach Patric
Abstract
AbstractPrevious correlational studies showed the importance of mindfulness and autonomous goal motivation for goal pursuit, goal setting, and goal disengagement processes. The present study examined the role of mindfulness in goal regulation processes for self-selected personal goals in a randomized waitlist control group design. Participants (N = 228, M = 30.7 years, 18–78 years; 84% female) either received daily 9-12-minute audio mindfulness exercises online for four weeks or were placed on a waitlist. Participants in the intervention group (N = 113) reported more goal progress compared with the control group (N = 116) at the end of the intervention. Autonomous goal motivation for already set goals did not influence change in goal progress. However, autonomous goal motivation for newly set goals was higher in the intervention group than in the control group. Additionally, we tested the role of mindfulness in interaction with goal attainability and autonomous motivation for goal adjustment processes (in this case, reduction of goal importance). In the control group, lower goal attainability at baseline was associated with a greater reduction in goal importance for less autonomous goals. For more autonomous goals, change in goal importance was independent from baseline attainability. In contrast, in the intervention group, all goals were slightly devalued over time independently from autonomous motivation and goal attainability at T1. Moreover, changes in goal attainability were positively linked to changes in goal importance over time. This effect was moderated by mindfulness and autonomous motivation. Overall, the findings point to the relevance of mindfulness and autonomous motivation for goal regulation processes.
Funder
Universität Hildesheim
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,Social Psychology
Reference100 articles.
1. Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides, & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2. Baltes, P. B. (1997). On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: Selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory. American Psychologist, 52(4), 366–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.4.366. 3. Barlow, M. A., Wrosch, C., & McGrath, J. J. (2020). Goal adjustment capacities and quality of life: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality, 88(2), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12492. 4. Bartos, L. J., Posadas, M. P., Wrapson, W., & Krägeloh, C. (2023). Increased effect sizes in a mindfulness- and yoga-based intervention after adjusting for response shift with then-test. Mindfulness, 14(4), 953–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-023-02102-x. 5. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
|
|