Abstract
AbstractConflicting hallmarks are attributed to cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections. CMVs are viewed as being master tacticians in “immune evasion” by subverting essentially all pathways of innate and adaptive immunity. On the other hand, CMV disease is undeniably restricted to the immunologically immature or immunocompromised host, whereas an intact immune system prevents virus spread, cytopathogenic tissue infection, and thus pathological organ manifestations. Therefore, the popular term “immune evasion” is apparently incongruous with the control of CMV infections in the immunocompetent human host as well as in experimental non-human primate and rodent models. Here, we review recent work from the mouse model that resolves this obvious discrepancy for the example of the virus-specific CD8 T-cell response. Immune evasion proteins encoded by murine CMV (mCMV) interfere with the cell surface trafficking of antigenic peptide-loaded MHC class-I (pMHC-I) complexes and thereby reduce their numbers available for interaction with T-cell receptors of CD8 T cells; but this inhibition is incomplete. As a consequence, while CD8 T cells with low interaction avidity fail to receive sufficient signaling for triggering their antiviral effector function in the presence of immune evasion proteins in infected cells, a few pMHC-I complexes that escape to the cell surface are sufficient for sensitizing high-avidity CD8 T cells. It is thus proposed that the function of immune evasion proteins is to raise the avidity threshold for activation, so that in the net result, only high-avidity cells can protect. An example showing that immune evasion proteins can make the difference between life and death is the lacking control of infection in a mouse model of MHC-I histoincompatible hematopoietic cell transplantation (allogeneic-HCT). In this model, only low-avidity CD8 T cells become reconstituted by HCT and almost all infected HCT recipients die of multiple-organ CMV disease when immune evasion proteins are expressed. In contrast, lowering the avidity threshold for antigen recognition by deletion of immune evasion proteins allowed control of infection and rescued from death.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Microbiology (medical),Immunology,General Medicine,Immunology and Allergy
Reference54 articles.
1. Davison AJ, Holton M, Dolan A, Dargan DJ, Gatherer D, Hayward GS (2013) Comparative genomics of primate cytomegaloviruses. In: Reddehase MJ (ed) Cytomegaloviruses: from molecular pathogenesis to intervention, vol I. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, pp 1–22
2. Redwood AJ, Shellam GR, Smith LM (2013) Molecular evolution of murine cytomegalovirus genomes. In: Reddehase MJ (ed) Cytomegaloviruses: from molecular pathogenesis to intervention, vol I. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, pp 23–37
3. Smith MG (1954) Propagation of salivary gland virus of the mouse in tissue cultures. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 86:435–440. https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-86-21123
4. Smith MG (1956) Propagation in tissue cultures of a cytopathogenic virus from human salivary gland virus (SGV) disease. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 92:424–430. https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-92-22498
5. Ostermann E, Pawletko K, Indenbirken D, Schumacher U, Brune W (2015) Stepwise adaptation of murine cytomegalovirus to cells of a foreign host for identification of host range determinants. Med Microbiol Immunol 204:461–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00430-015-0400-7