Abstract
AbstractSince late 2021, the variant landscape of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been dominated by the variant of concern (VoC) Omicron and its sublineages. We and others have shown that the detection of Omicron-BA.1 and -BA.2-positive respiratory specimens by rapid antigen tests (RATs) is impaired compared to Delta VoC-containing samples. Here, in a single-center retrospective laboratory study, we evaluated the performance of ten most commonly used RATs for the detection of Omicron-BA.4 and -BA.5 infections. We used 171 respiratory swab specimens from SARS-CoV-2 RNA-positive patients, of which 71 were classified as BA.4 and 100 as BA.5. All swabs were collected between July and September 2022. 50 SARS-CoV-2 PCR-negative samples from healthy individuals, collected in October 2022, showed high specificity in 9 out of 10 RATs. When assessing analytical sensitivity using clinical specimens, the 50% limit of detection (LoD50) ranged from 7.6 × 104 to 3.3 × 106 RNA copies subjected to the RATs for BA.4 compared to 6.8 × 104 to 3.0 × 106 for BA.5. Overall, intra-assay differences for the detection of these two Omicron subvariants were not significant for both respiratory swabs and tissue culture-expanded virus isolates. In contrast, marked heterogeneity was observed among the ten RATs: to be positive in these point-of-care tests, up to 443-fold (BA.4) and up to 56-fold (BA.5) higher viral loads were required for the worst performing RAT compared to the best performing RAT. True-positive rates for Omicron-BA.4- or -BA.5-containing specimens in the highest viral load category (Ct values < 25) ranged from 94.3 to 34.3%, dropping to 25.6 to 0% for samples with intermediate Ct values (25–30). We conclude that the high heterogeneity in the performance of commonly used RATs remains a challenge for the general public to obtain reliable results in the evolving Omicron subvariant-driven pandemic.
Funder
Bay-VOC
FOR-COVID
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Microbiology (medical),Immunology,General Medicine,Immunology and Allergy
Reference87 articles.
1. Carabelli AM, Peacock TP, Thorne LG, Harvey WT, Hughes J, de Silva TI et al (2023) SARS-CoV-2 variant biology: immune escape, transmission and fitness. Nat Rev Microbiol 21(3):162–177. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-022-00841-7
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID data tracker. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#variant-proportions. Accessed 16 Feb 2023
3. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Weekly COVID-19 country overview. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/covid-19/country-overviews. Accessed 16 Feb 2023
4. American Society for Microbiology. Supply Shortages Impacting COVID-19 and Non-COVID Testing. https://asm.org/Articles/2020/September/Clinical-Microbiology-Supply-Shortage-Collecti-1. Accessed 16 Feb 2023
5. outbreak.info. Lineage comparisons. https://gisaid.org/lineage-comparison/. Accessed 16 Feb 2023
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献