Ten rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 widely differ in their ability to detect Omicron-BA.4 and -BA.5

Author:

Krenn Franziska,Dächert Christopher,Badell Irina,Lupoli Gaia,Öztan Gamze Naz,Feng Tianle,Schneider Nikolas,Huber Melanie,Both Hanna,Späth Patricia M.,Muenchhoff Maximilian,Graf Alexander,Krebs Stefan,Blum Helmut,Durner Jürgen,Czibere Ludwig,Kaderali Lars,Keppler Oliver T.,Baldauf Hanna-Mari,Osterman AndreasORCID

Abstract

AbstractSince late 2021, the variant landscape of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been dominated by the variant of concern (VoC) Omicron and its sublineages. We and others have shown that the detection of Omicron-BA.1 and -BA.2-positive respiratory specimens by rapid antigen tests (RATs) is impaired compared to Delta VoC-containing samples. Here, in a single-center retrospective laboratory study, we evaluated the performance of ten most commonly used RATs for the detection of Omicron-BA.4 and -BA.5 infections. We used 171 respiratory swab specimens from SARS-CoV-2 RNA-positive patients, of which 71 were classified as BA.4 and 100 as BA.5. All swabs were collected between July and September 2022. 50 SARS-CoV-2 PCR-negative samples from healthy individuals, collected in October 2022, showed high specificity in 9 out of 10 RATs. When assessing analytical sensitivity using clinical specimens, the 50% limit of detection (LoD50) ranged from 7.6 × 104 to 3.3 × 106 RNA copies subjected to the RATs for BA.4 compared to 6.8 × 104 to 3.0 × 106 for BA.5. Overall, intra-assay differences for the detection of these two Omicron subvariants were not significant for both respiratory swabs and tissue culture-expanded virus isolates. In contrast, marked heterogeneity was observed among the ten RATs: to be positive in these point-of-care tests, up to 443-fold (BA.4) and up to 56-fold (BA.5) higher viral loads were required for the worst performing RAT compared to the best performing RAT. True-positive rates for Omicron-BA.4- or -BA.5-containing specimens in the highest viral load category (Ct values < 25) ranged from 94.3 to 34.3%, dropping to 25.6 to 0% for samples with intermediate Ct values (25–30). We conclude that the high heterogeneity in the performance of commonly used RATs remains a challenge for the general public to obtain reliable results in the evolving Omicron subvariant-driven pandemic.

Funder

Bay-VOC

FOR-COVID

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Microbiology (medical),Immunology,General Medicine,Immunology and Allergy

Reference87 articles.

1. Carabelli AM, Peacock TP, Thorne LG, Harvey WT, Hughes J, de Silva TI et al (2023) SARS-CoV-2 variant biology: immune escape, transmission and fitness. Nat Rev Microbiol 21(3):162–177. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-022-00841-7

2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID data tracker. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#variant-proportions. Accessed 16 Feb 2023

3. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Weekly COVID-19 country overview. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/covid-19/country-overviews. Accessed 16 Feb 2023

4. American Society for Microbiology. Supply Shortages Impacting COVID-19 and Non-COVID Testing. https://asm.org/Articles/2020/September/Clinical-Microbiology-Supply-Shortage-Collecti-1. Accessed 16 Feb 2023

5. outbreak.info. Lineage comparisons. https://gisaid.org/lineage-comparison/. Accessed 16 Feb 2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3