Postoperative renal morbidity and mortality after volume replacement with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 or albumin during surgery: a propensity score-matched study
-
Published:2020-08-11
Issue:6
Volume:34
Page:881-891
-
ISSN:0913-8668
-
Container-title:Journal of Anesthesia
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Anesth
Author:
Miyao HidekiORCID, Kotake Yoshifumi
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
We aimed to compare retrospectively the rates of renal morbidity and mortality in surgical patients receiving 6% HES 130/0.4 to those receiving albumin.
Methods
From a Japanese nationwide medical database between 2014 and 2016, we identified adults who received HES 130/0.4 (HES group) or albumin (albumin group) as a single colloid solution on the day of surgery. After propensity score matching, the two groups were analyzed with χ2 or Mann Whitney U test. The primary outcome was the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). Secondary outcomes included the incidence of renal-replacement therapy, hospital length of stay, in-hospital 30-day mortality, the use of vasoactive agents, and the fluid requirement on the day of surgery.
Results
Of 76,048 patients in the database, propensity score matching identified 289 matched pairs. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of AKI between the HES and the albumin group (15.2% vs. 20.8%, respectively: P = 0.08). The secondary outcomes did not differ between groups except the following. Median hospital stay was 5 days shorter in the HES group (18 vs. 23 days; P < 0.001), and the median net fluid requirement on the day of surgery was 15 mL/kg lower in the HES group (140 vs. 155 mL/kg, respectively; P = 0.01).
Conclusions
Postoperative renal morbidity and mortality did not differ between patients receiving HES 130/0.4 and those receiving albumin. HES 130/0.4 was associated with shorter hospital stay and less fluid requirement compared to albumin. These findings support the use of 6% HES 130/0.4 for perioperative volume replacement as an alternative to albumin.
Trial registration
UMIN000027896 and the date of registration was June 30, 2017 at https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index-j.html.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Reference42 articles.
1. Brandstrup B, Tønnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, Hjortsø E, Ording H, Lindorff-Larsen K, Rasmussen MS, Lanng C, Wallin L, Iversen LH, Gramkow CS, Okholm M, Blemmer T, Svendsen P-E, Rottensten HH, Thage B, Riis J, Jeppesen IS, Teilum D, Christensen AM, Graungaard B, Pott F. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2003;238:641–8. 2. Lobo DN, Bostock KA, Neal KR, Perkins AC, Rowlands BJ, Allison SP. Effect of salt and water balance on recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1812–8. 3. Feldheiser A, Aziz O, Baldini G, Cox BPBW, Fearon KCH, Feldman LS, Gan TJ, Kennedy RH, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN, Miller T, Radtke FF, Ruiz Garces T, Schricker T, Scott MJ, Thacker JK, Ytrebø LM, Carli F. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016;60:289–334. 4. Myles PS, Bellomo R, Corcoran T, Forbes A, Peyton P, Story D, Christophi C, Leslie K, Mcguinness S, Parke R, Serpell J, Chan MTV, Painter T, Mccluskey S, Minto G, Wallace S. Restrictive versus liberal fluid therapy for major abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2263–74. 5. Trof RJ, Sukul SP, Twisk JWR, Girbes ARJ, Groeneveld ABJ. Greater cardiac response of colloid than saline fluid loading in septic and non-septic critically ill patients with clinical hypovolaemia. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:697–701.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|