Author:
Hiotis Spiros,Weber Sharon,Wong W. Douglas
Reference52 articles.
1. Starck M, Bohe M, Fork FT, Lindstrom C, and Sjoberg S. Endoluminal ultrasound and low-field magnetic resonance imaging are superior to clinical examination in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Eur. J. Surg., 161 (11) (1995) 841–845.
2. Nicholls RJ, Mason AY, Morson BC, Dixon AK, and Fry IK. The clinical staging of rectal cancer. Br. J. Surg., 69 (7) (1982) 404–409.
3. Beynon J, Mortensen NJ, Foy DM, Channer JL, Virjee J, and Goddard P. Pre-operative assessment of local invasion in rectal cancer: digital examination, endoluminal sonography or computed tomography? Br. J. Surg., 73 (12) (1986) 1015–1017.
4. Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D, Chalmers AG, Chennells P, Dixon MF, Finan PJ, et al. Endoluminal ultrasound and computed tomography in the staging of rectal cancer. Br. J. Surg., 75 (10) (1988) 1019–1022.
5. Zerhouni EA, Rutter C, Hamilton SR, Balfe DM, Megibow AJ, Francis IR, et al. CT and MR imaging in the staging of colorectal carcinoma: report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group II. Radiology, 200 (2) (1996) 443–451.