Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Philosophy,Religious studies
Reference16 articles.
1. Alston, W. P. (1986). Epistemic circularity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 47(1), 1–30.
2. Beilby, J. (Ed.). (2002). Naturalism defeated? Essays on Plantinga’s evolutionary argument against naturalism. Ithica: Cornell University Press.
3. Bosse, R. (2018). Wunder’s probability objections. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 84, 131–142.
4. Collins, R. (2009). The teleological argument: an exploration of the fine-tuning of the universe. In W. L. Craig & J. P. Moreland (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to natural theology (pp. 202–281). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
5. Hendricks, P. (2018). Response to Wunder: objective probability, non-contingent theism, and the EAAN. Religious Studies, 1–5 First View. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412518000306.