Abstract
AbstractDwayne Moore’s "A Naturalistic Theodicy for Sterba’s Problem of Natural Evil," (Moore, 2024) provides a detailed critique of my logical argument from evil against the existence of the God of traditional theism. While there have been many critiques of my logical argument against the existence of the God of traditional theism from moral evil to which I have replied (2020b, 2020c, 2021, 2023), there has been only one previous critique that was directed at my logical argument from natural evil (see Jordan, 2023). Accordingly, I welcome this opportunity to show how my logical argument from natural evil works against Moore’s critique.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference12 articles.
1. Carroll, S. (2017). The big picture. Dutton.
2. Jordan, J. (2023). Animal suffering and the laws of nature. Religions, 13, 1049. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13111049
3. McMahan, J. (2015). The moral problem of predation. In A. Chignell, T. Cuneo, & M. C. Halteman (Eds.), Philosophy comes to dinner (pp. 268–292). Routledge.
4. Moore, D. (2024). A naturalistic theodicy for Sterba’s problem of natural evil. Sophia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-024-01004-2
5. Sterba, J. (2019). Is a Good God Logically Possible? Palgrave.