Explainable reinforcement learning (XRL): a systematic literature review and taxonomy

Author:

Bekkemoen YanzheORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn recent years, reinforcement learning (RL) systems have shown impressive performance and remarkable achievements. Many achievements can be attributed to combining RL with deep learning. However, those systems lack explainability, which refers to our understanding of the system’s decision-making process. In response to this challenge, the new explainable RL (XRL) field has emerged and grown rapidly to help us understand RL systems. This systematic literature review aims to give a unified view of the field by reviewing ten existing XRL literature reviews and 189 XRL studies from the past five years. Furthermore, we seek to organize these studies into a new taxonomy, discuss each area in detail, and draw connections between methods and stakeholder questions (e.g., “how can I get the agent to do _?”). Finally, we look at the research trends in XRL, recommend XRL methods, and present some exciting research directions for future research. We hope stakeholders, such as RL researchers and practitioners, will utilize this literature review as a comprehensive resource to overview existing state-of-the-art XRL methods. Additionally, we strive to help find research gaps and quickly identify methods that answer stakeholder questions.

Funder

Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet

NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Software

Reference345 articles.

1. Abbeel, P., & Ng, AY. (2004). Apprenticeship learning via inverse reinforcement learning. In: C. E. Brodley (Ed.), Machine learning, Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference (ICML 2004), ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, vol 69. ACM https://doi.org/10.1145/1015330.1015430,

2. Acharya, A., Russell, R.L., & Ahmed, N.R. (2020). Explaining conditions for reinforcement learning behaviors from real and imagined data. NeurIPS Workshop on Challenges of Real-World RL https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2011.09004

3. Achiam, J. (2018). Spinning up in deep reinforcement learning. https://spinningup.openai.com/en/latest/index.html

4. Adebayo, J., Gilmer, J., Muelly, M., et al. (2018). Sanity checks for saliency maps. In S. Bengio , H. M. Wallach, H. Larochelle et al. (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 31: Annual conference on neural information processing systems NeurIPS 2018, Montréal, pp 9525–9536, https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2018/hash/294a8ed24b1ad22ec2e7efea049b8737-Abstract.html

5. Adebayo, J., Muelly, M., Abelson, H., et al. (2022). Post hoc explanations may be ineffective for detecting unknown spurious correlation. In The tenth international conference on learning representations, ICLR 2022, Virtual Event. OpenReview.net, https://openreview.net/forum?id=xNOVfCCvDpM

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3