Learning with mitigating random consistency from the accuracy measure

Author:

Wang Jieting,Qian YuhuaORCID,Li Feijiang

Abstract

AbstractHuman beings may make random guesses in decision-making. Occasionally, their guesses may generate consistency with the real situation. This kind of consistency is termed random consistency. In the area of machine leaning, the randomness is unavoidable and ubiquitous in learning algorithms. However, the accuracy (A), which is a fundamental performance measure for machine learning, does not recognize the random consistency. This causes that the classifiers learnt by A contain the random consistency. The random consistency may cause an unreliable evaluation and harm the generalization performance. To solve this problem, the pure accuracy (PA) is defined to eliminate the random consistency from the A. In this paper, we mainly study the necessity, learning consistency and leaning method of the PA. We show that the PA is insensitive to the class distribution of classifier and is more fair to the majority and the minority than A. Subsequently, some novel generalization bounds on the PA and A are given. Furthermore, we show that the PA is Bayes-risk consistent in finite and infinite hypothesis space. We design a plug-in rule that maximizes the PA, and the experiments on twenty benchmark data sets demonstrate that the proposed method performs statistically better than the kernel logistic regression in terms of PA and comparable performance in terms of A. Compared with the other plug-in rules, the proposed method obtains much better performance.

Funder

National Key R&D Program of China

National Natural Science Foundation of China

ShanXi Science and Technology Department

Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province

Program for the San Jin Young Scholars of Shanxi

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Software

Reference54 articles.

1. Agarwal, S., Graepel, T., Herbrich, R., Har-Peled, S., & Roth, D. (2005a). Generalization bounds for the area under the ROC curve. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 6(2), 393–425.

2. Agarwal, S., Harpeled, S., & Roth, D. (2005b). A uniform convergence bound for the area under the ROC curve. In Proceedings of the international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics (pp. 1–8).

3. Albatineh, A. N., & Niewiadomska-Bugaj, M. (2011). Correcting Jaccard and other similarity indices for chance agreement in cluster analysis. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 5(3), 179–200.

4. Albatineh, A. N., Niewiadomskabugaj, M., & Mihalko, D. (2006). On similarity indices and correction for chance agreement. Journal of Classification, 23(2), 301–313.

5. Alcalafdez, J., Sanchez, L., Garcia, S., Jesus, M. J. D., Ventura, S., Garrell, J. M., et al. (2008). KEEL: A software tool to assess evolutionary algorithms for data mining problems. Soft Computing, 13(3), 307–318.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Gini index and decision tree method with mitigating random consistency;SCIENTIA SINICA Informationis;2024-01-01

2. Slack-Factor-Based Fuzzy Support Vector Machine for Class Imbalance Problems;ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data;2023-03

3. Generalization Performance of Pure Accuracy and its Application in Selective Ensemble Learning;IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence;2023-02-01

4. RSS-Bagging: Improving Generalization Through the Fisher Information of Training Data;IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3