A host-based approach for the prioritisation of surveillance of plant pests and pathogens in wild flora and natural habitats in the UK

Abstract

AbstractNon-native plant pests/pathogens are a mostly overlooked threat to biodiversity. Surveillance for plant pests and pathogens is key to early detection yet is rarely undertaken in natural habitats. Current methodologies to prioritise surveillance are pest-based, there is no methodology available to help managers identify 'at risk' hosts and habitats for targeted surveillance. This study compares four host-based methods. Prioritisation of: (1) plant genera known to host the pests/pathogens most likely to establish (Host-pest); (2) habitats known to host the greatest number of pests/pathogens most likely to establish (Habitat-pest); (3) plants classed as foundation species (those that drive ecosystem functioning and support populations of dependent biodiversity) (Foundation-species); (4) habitats with low plant species diversity and hence low resilience (Habitat-resilience). Twelve habitats and 22 heathland vegetation communities in the UK were used as a case-study. The Host-pest method gave 121 plant genera to monitor across all habitats and 14 within heathlands. The Habitat-pest and Habitat-resilience methods prioritised different habitats because the Habitat-pest method uses existing lists of pests which are biased towards those of commercial importance. The Foundation-species method gave 272 species for surveillance across all habitats and 14 within heathlands. Surveillance of habitats and plants prioritised on potential ecological impact (the Foundation-species and Habitat-resilience methods) is recommended rather than known pests/pathogens (the Host-pest and Habitat-pest methods) as this avoids biases within existing lists of pests/pathogens, removes the need for the prioritisation to be regularly updated as new pests/pathogens are identified and takes account of impacts on associated biodiversity and ecosystem functions.